Drew Stangle

You don't get it both ways. You ban books for violence and sex, you ban the holy books too. You say oh well not "my" holy books, you should get sued for violating the separation oof church and state. No public school should have any form of religious texts if it also will ban books for "vulgar and immoral actions". I'm so sick of religious zealots getting babies because people are trying to make them obey the laws they are blatantly abusing. I don't see Wiccans demanding our authors be put in schools, but hey maybe we should. After all our texts also teach good morals and love.

Brien

Only zealots believe that they have the right to ban books. But when the shoe is on the other foot they cry foul. Well, you can't have it both ways. Remember, YOU started this whole ridiculous book banning obsession. Now live with the results of your actions.

Colleen McAllister

I don't believe in banning books. I do believe that school libraries should have age appropriate materials. A standard Bible might be too much for Elementary age schools but fine for High School or College. There are also Bibles geared for children or teens.

Banning books outright is a slippery slope that should not be attempted.

Dan Anderson

I have no problem with KJV1611 being in school libraries, right next to the Qur'an, the Bhagavad Gita, the numerous sutras from Buddhism, and other writings relating to religion.

To use any 'holy book' in a class, it must be relevant to the topic. For example, the Bible as Literature, the Historicity of the Qur'an, etc. The other location in schools would be in a Comparative World Religions class, and taught ONLY by authorities on the subject.

Rev. Dr. Father JJ

the bibble is a religious document and therefore has no place in public schools or institutions

the only reason to insist on having it in school is in pursuit of the kkkristofascist, nationalist, dominionist agenda of kkkrischin-izing the entire country

these are not good people. not by any means.

Daniel Todd Kamm

A number of years ago, we had a lead teacher (the one who runs things if the principal is off the campus) at our public school who chose to provide 6th graders instruction in ancient Egypt straight from the King James bible, version whatever version she was reading from.

I know this is true because I was sitting in her classroom observing and assessing a student in her class. And I saw and heard the whole thing.

As someone with a deep appreciation for history, archaeology, anthropology and social studies in general, I was appalled.

As a Jew, I was even more appalled.

Not only was she wrong about how and what she was conveying about ancient Egyptian history, she was dragging the histories of ancient Semitic peoples of all descriptions through the British biblical mud as well.

Such a disservice to the kids, and an academic crime. And illegal in this state... depending who you are.

She should have been reprimanded. But she was married to one of the district's high level high school football coaches, so that wasn't happening.

And in her own gifted area, mathematics, she was an inspiration: to the kids and me...one of the best math teachers out there, I have to say. I've only found one better. She should stick with the math, nu?

At the time the history crime occurred, my concerns fell on deaf ears. But things have changed.

For one thing, this particular teacher is gone and lying to students at another school. I am neither grateful nor ungrateful but I do fear the impact on our district youths' history education. As a math teacher they have a gem and will learn a lot.

Something about staying in one's lane?

But I can happily report that at our school the 6th graders' experiment in the history of Ancient Egypt is under the instruction of an inspired history teacher, and they engage in a a very hands on project and performance piece, with the kids exploring everything ancient Egyptian, from birth, life, death, to food, games, music, dance making paper from papyrus and even some Egyptian religion thrown in. It's hard to miss that one in ancient Egypt!

This is the second year for this production, and the entire school and surrounding neighborhood (inner city suburb) are invited to see what the kids have learned and have to show us: displays, plays, brief lectures, videos, etc.

When it comes to the issue of any religious text in schools, I tend towards the strict separation of church and state. They must not be displayed, conveyed via instruction, or incorporated in any way into schools codes of conduct or discipline.

Then I think:

Our public libraries have religious texts and more in their stacks, because it is considered literature and information, and perhaps even history. Perhaps the bible and other religious texts that are age appropriate may be made available in school libraries for the same purposes.

But only as long as other religious texts are included, whether they derive from the bible, the oral traditions of our indigenous peoples or as far and wide as the Wiradjuri peoples of Australia.

And certainly not as any violation of church and state which is very clear under the Constitution, publicly the moral and legal guiding force for all of us who share public space.

"Religion" in school = bad juju.

Matthew Mastrogiovanni

Yes, it should be banned. Children shouldn't be exposed to: Genocide, murder, incest, rape, and all the other depravities contained in that death cult book, dedicated to a narcissistic deity.

John Ash McCormick

If you "edit" a Bible down by taking out the bad parts then you don't have The Bible any longer. You are also tacitly admitting that there are parts of The Bible which should not be read. Then you get the problem of just who does the editing.

It would make for a short paperback.

How about "Be nice to other people and mind your own damn business?"

These book banning arguments always generate the same posts.

I check out each new one just to see if anyone has any new thoughts - they never do.

Why not go back to asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

The good thing about these fights is that they keep people busy with nonsense.

Ellen B. Wentzel

I don't think it necessarily be banned, just don't make it mandatory in the classroom. There are many different religions that are NEVER taught and maybe should be.

GypsyFire

No religion in school unless you are prepared to teach all religions because it is unfair that ine religion be pushed on a child or made to feel like it is the only religion that is right.

Nicholas J Page

We have this before you can not force religion on anyone.The best thing is to keep a stock of bibles and let the children make up their own minds up.

Pastor Lyn

Easy peasy. If public schools are forced to add the Christian Bible, then they have to add every religious book of any kind. Including from Satanists. Especially since Satanists are one of the big powers behind religious freedom and women's rights and pro-choice rights. Then there are many Wiccan and Pagan books. Religious freedom is just that. The right to believe what you want without persecution. That also includes who to love, the color of one's skin, etc. Islam has 72 different sects, to include the Taliban. If you do not want these things in your public schools, then leave the propaganda of Christianity out of the schools as well. Forcing children and families to have to deal with this is fanatical and insane. Some Christians seem to be bent on forcing their beliefs down peoples throats. I don't even believe in forcing children to attend church of any kind. Keep religion out of public schools and politics. It's distasteful.

High Priestess Vega

ALL AND I REPEAT ALL RELIGIOUS TEXTS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM SCHOOLS. Period. You can teach tolerance without teaching the actual religion. Lessons on actual religions should be left to universities and colleges. Just like you can teach tolerance for LGBTQIA2S people without teaching actual sex, you can teach religious tolerance without actual religious texts.

Clay Serenbetz

When schools are ready to put the Satanic Bible next to the Christian Bible, the Koran, the Tipikata, etc. on the shelves and also teach all of them equally then I would support their inclusion. Otherwise, then schools are favoring one religion over another, which is Constitutionally impermissible.

Billie Jo Wabisca VanEss

As a firm believer in the importance of freedom of religion and the value of spiritual education, I firmly believe that the Bible should not be banned from public schools. The Bible holds a significant place in human history, culture, and literature, and to exclude it from the educational system would be a disservice to students. Instead of banning the Bible, it should be embraced as a valuable resource for teaching about different religions, moral values, and ethical principles.

The Bible is not just a religious text; it is a document that has shaped the way people think, act, and govern themselves for centuries. It is a foundational text of Western civilization and has influenced art, music, literature, and philosophy. By studying the Bible in a public school setting, students can gain a deeper understanding of the cultural and historical contexts that have shaped our world today.

Moreover, the Bible is a moral and ethical guide that can help students develop a strong sense of values and character. By reading the stories of the Bible and reflecting on the teachings of Jesus Christ, students can learn important lessons about compassion, forgiveness, and love. These are values that are essential for building a just and compassionate society.

In addition, studying the Bible can help students develop critical thinking skills and engage in meaningful discussions about complex ethical issues. By exploring the themes and ideas presented in the Bible, students can learn how to analyze texts, think critically about different perspectives, and make informed judgments. These skills are essential for success in college, in the workplace, and in life.

Furthermore, the Bible can provide students with a sense of comfort and guidance during difficult times. In a world that is often chaotic and uncertain, the teachings of the Bible can serve as a source of strength and solace. By studying the Bible in a public school setting, students can learn how to navigate the challenges and struggles of life with courage and resilience.

Ultimately, the Bible should not be banned from public schools. Instead, it should be embraced as a valuable resource for teaching moral values, ethical principles, and cultural understanding. By studying the Bible, students can gain a deeper appreciation for the beauty and complexity of the world around them and develop the skills and values they need to become responsible and compassionate adults. Let us embrace the Word of God in our public schools and allow it to enrich the lives of our students and our society as a whole.

Walter Abington

What seems to be the driving force to ban books in the USA not only deals with sex and violence but the opponents also have a desire to conceal the true history of our nation, that being racism, slavery, and genocide. The same application to ban those books from school libraries should be used to ban the Bible, Old Testament, and New Testament, from school libraries and teachers should not be allowed to preach – teach from that book. The far right agenda is to control the information allowed school children to read. They want to hide from their children the fact their parents were involved in trying to prevent equality in the country and not just ban books. Equality begins at home.

Lenny L Kouma

Religion is a personal and parental choice. NO religion should be taught or forced on students of differing faiths. Leave all religious material out of the school system unless it is a book with an overview of ALL religions to show the diversity of choices.

James Riggle-Johnson

If than ban other books for including graphic texts and subjects, then the bible should be banned right along with them. You can’t have it both ways. Let’s just stop banning books. Problem solved.

Reverend Paula Copp

No religious texts should be allowed in public schools for k-12 students. That way, no one religion is left out…

Lionheart

I personally think that all works of fiction, including Grimm’s Fairy Tales, Harry Potter etc., should be allowed in schools.

🦁❤️

Alan Jones

Education is about opening up opportunities to learn and teachers are responsible for managing (to a degree) the material they are exposed to.

The issue with any religious text is that the content is often treated literally rather than symbolically. Moreover the context in which such texts were written are also vitally important.

To fail to encourage critical thinking when reading any text is dangerous. Extremism thrives in situations when valid questions are censored.

Religious texts being taught as “truth” creates a problem. Schools, I believe, need to be free to explore religious beliefs in the context of history, philosophy and sociology.

Educators are educators and not the proponents of any specific belief. Religious intolerance thrives in situations where one belief is taught as the only belief.

There is an argument for schools to be very neutral with regards belief and not becoming an advertisement for any single faith.

Belief is a personal thing and in order to come to your own belief there needs to be time and space for questions to be asked. Spiritual texts like The Bible, the Koran, the Torah and so on can be studied within the framework of comparative religion.

The wholesale banning of any book is something we need to question and challenge - think if any extremist regime. Likewise the promotion of any single text as being “the truth” or “the only way” is equally dangerous.

Alan /|\

Peter Senderowitz

No problem with the Bible because most people don't actually read it. They allow intermediaries like priests, rabbis, imams and all sorts of holy rollers to them how to act and think according to this Bible. No need to ban the book, just ban the clergy. Rev. Senderowitz

Doc

I see a different issue. I have no problem with a course in religion. But, make sure it's a critical examination of the texts that underpin that religion. One could spend a year discussing the difficult logic, discrepancies, etc. in the bible. That book is really its own worst enemy when it comes to promulgating belief. But examine other religions and other texts as well. It's a great intellectual exercise when taught correctly. Using it for indoctrination violates church/state separation.

Michael Shane Kendrick

I understand the parental desire, no, need to protect our country's children. However, banning books is not that. Instead it is shear laziness and fear. Access to books will only damage children if there are not parents or responsible guardians to help put the material into context and offer perspective. It is not institutional failure for allowing these books in our places of learning or worship for children to read. It is instead, our failure as parents for not adequately guiding and supporting our children who read the materials. Banning books is much akin to making a martyr, for whatever is taboo, becomes instantly desirable.

Tommy Edward Merritt

I agree. No Bible in schools. The story's in the book are ridiculous and have no evidence to suggest most of it took place.

Rev. Michelle Love

The Bible was not written for children. That being said, instead of banning it entirely, why not consider removing it from school libraries so that students are not exposed to this content without their parents'consent.

Shawn David Spencer

I have read the bible since I was a child. Never have I had any desire or temptation to look upon the bible for reference to adult pornographic content. I'm sure many of us remember reading the bible as a child, do any of you say the same. For centuries scholars and theologians have always summarized the bible as, "a book that is left to the readers interpretation." People are free to believe what they believe the truth is. If this man believes that the bible is full of seditious adult content then that is his interpretation of it. Personally I do not remember ever reading about female tools of pleasure, as far as I know those things were not invented until the 19th century. That just general knowledge, I'm no professional on the subject so my opinion of course, is subject to interpretation. However in general the bible has always been a reference for wisdom and moral foundation that tell of examples of various men and women who made the wrong choices and the consequences for their choices. For that reason I do not think the bible should be banned from libraries or classrooms for it can be interpreted as a tool for teaching just as much as any other scholastic article of literary knowledge.

Joseph Grieco

In my Three-Score-and Ten on this Earth, I have read many different versions of the Bible. Some are beautiful literature with religious insight, others are barely readable. Within the Bible, some books are excellent for literature study (Ecclesiastes, Job), some are important to gain perspective on our approach to faith (Psalms, the Epistles - especially the Non-Pauline ones). However, the Bible is NOT History! Every book up through Chronicles was based on the different oral traditions complied from the Northern (Israel) and Southern (Judah) kingdoms. And even then you find the differences between the Canaanite and Philistine forms of worship that made their way into Judaism. You cannot even read the first five chapters of Genesis without spotting all of the contradictions that are glossed over. OK. All that being said, should the Bible be banned? No. It should be available to all. However, what version should be made available? There are enough problems with the KJV that, while in beautiful late 16th early 17th Century English, it is now one of the less readable versions. Should it be the Douay version? Oh, no, Creeping Popism! Should it be the NRSV? Too "Middle of the Road" for many folks. Should it be the Jerusalem? This time, galloping Popism! If Christians cannot agree on what translation of the Bible to use, maybe we should all go back, learn Latin and use only St Jerome's Vulgate version! So, in order to satisfy the needs, we likely would need an entire shelf with each available translation (Geneva Version anyone?) so people could read and compare between them.

Teresa

No. The Bible is too vague. Scholars are still trying to decipher the parables. Grade school children are not old enough to understand, and you take the chance of warping their minds. Middle and High school is ok, but on a voluntary. When I was in school, we actually had Bible study, but it was an opt in. I graduated in 1984. In a very rural, southern town. We had the 10 commandments in every class room. It made no difference in the quality of students, or citizens that our school made. Half the class of 1984 are either dead from cancer, or overdose. None of them lived this fairytale life, of goodness and kindness, because of the Commandments, or church, or the Bible study group, that has 25 members.

The bigotry and hateful comments on this thread has saddened and disappointed me. Religious extremism on full display! Smh. The very reason I left the church years ago. So disheartening. We are supposed to walk as Jesus. But I think he has been replaced with something that is anti-christianity. 😭😭😭

Lucia Kay Karakitsios

The Bible should be available in the school library along with the Koran, the Bhagavad Gita and the Torah.

John T. Watson

I believe that the Bible should be taught at the High Scool level because some of the content is very graphic. My main reason for teaching it is that it details the early history of mankind and much of what is written is very close to what we are living today. As the Bible states, "What was, Is, and Will Be Again. There is nothing new under the sun,"

Tareq Asfour

It’s a great read better than any Stephen King Horror Novels….

Edward D Torres

The Framers of our State Constitutions acknowledge the One God of the Bible and call him Almighty God or The Devine and we're not confused about THE One God we are under or The One God we Trust. We make concessions for other Religions in your freedom to worship.

Stephanie A Willey

No books should be banned in public schools, but the Bible and other possibly controversial books and writings should be part of well rounded studies. Present the Bible along with the Koran, Tora and every other religious text in a comparative religions course.

Lionheart

I personally think that all works of fiction, including Grimm’s Fairy Tales, Harry Potter etc., should be allowed in schools.

🦁❤️

Donna May Evans

Yes unless every Religion Book is taught.

Charles Paul Biederman

I don’t follow the pope I follow GOD

Steven Ferrell

There are things that are age appropriate. Books showing nudity or sexual acts are not appropriate for young children. There is a reason movies are rated and only adults can purchase them.
Yet it seems some want the alphabet bunch to show that to children because it’s what the alphabet bunch want.

Wendy Irene Copeland

First, I do not believe in banning any books. Books should be available to inquiring minds. That being said, perhaps some books could be placed in libraries in the older children section. When I was young, there was such a section sequestered off and "patrolled" by the librarian. If you were too young and were found there, you were marched right back out again. As far as the Bible, I say keep it there. Along with all the other holy books of all religions.

Theresa C. Marquess

Banning books is a mistake. It has been unilized by the world's worst political figures as a control over the people. We do not need to start that again. Socialism may look attractive to some, but once there, they will not like what has become of their world.

Juanita Galindo

I believe the Bible should be in school libraries, If a child wants to read it. I do not believe it should be pushed on the child but it should be there if it’s their choice to read it.

Iris Smaus

I don't think books should be banned, whether it's the Bible or anything else. Certainly schools engaging minors must be sensible and conscientious regarding what is age/maturity appropriate - there are certain books that are not helpful for young, developing minds to undertake until they have the emotional maturity to do so in a balanced enough manner. There is a wonderful African American host on TCM named Jaqueline Stewart who's an expert in film, particularly Black and silent films - she's taught classes on them, but she does not avoid or exclude those films that have racial disparaties or stereotypes and bigoted situations, she shows them and uses them as teaching tools. Any book can be discussed and used as a valuable teaching tool by an experienced and excellent teacher, it's all in how it's done. People often seem lacking confidence in their childrens' ability to reason it seems, or they're afraid things will corrupt their kids. Then why not sit down with them and discuss the books instead of just banning them? Too much fear, unfortunately.

James Alan Cooper

The Bible should never be banned. The only reason to censor and ban any books from schools should be to protect the children. Every school should ban sexually explicit books and extremely violent books with lack of value for human rights.

Robert James Brazeau

Under the First Amendment, the Bible should not be used as a religious teaching tool in school. Yet under the same Amendment, neither should it be banned from school libraries, regardless of its content. It should appear on the same shelf as the Koran, the Talmud and other religious texts.

Joe Stutler

If you want to ban books in schools for the various reasons given by Morons4Lunacy and their ilk, the Bible must be included in such bans.

AetherAgent

No books should ever be banned, though common sense and common decency should discourage topics of blatantly questionable moral character; topics of which even the readers would agree appeal to one's lower nature. To the contrary, the Bible should be welcomed, along with the Quran, Hermetica, Torah, Emerald Tablet, Vedas, Asclepius, Puranas, I Ching, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Tripitaka, Tao Te Ching, Book of the Dead, Upanishads, and many more; far too many to list here.

Dena Oliver

I think the Bible should not be in schools, unless every Bible from every religion is there. The Torah the Catholic Bible, satanic Bible, Islam, Mormon etc, by just giving the Bible for schools, is not fair because some people are Islam some people belong to the satanic Church some people believe different beliefs. So they have to make it fair that every religious belief is and will be available for each student of different faith. Now how are they going to do this with different beliefs. I don't know. I live in San Antonio and 12 of our public schools are closed so unless all religions, Bible's are accepted then I will be in agreement with that law. But the Bible alone just the Bible the regular 66 page Bible King James version, amplified etc. Then I have to say no on that the Bible shouldn't be allowed. Unless the other religions are recognized as well. Thank you Minister Dena

Kay Talley

No, but it shouldn’t be alone on the shelf under Religion. There are plenty versions of religious texts of all faiths tamed down for children. Religion is a part of life for many families and I don’t see anything wrong with little Johnnie taking out a Bible, Quran, Torah, whatever.

Smut and gore are everywhere. Fact of life. Just tone it down for young ones, please! If you want to get into smutty and set the giggles going in the classroom, introduce your 12 year olds to some Chaucer for English Literature. That will do it.

I’m a spiritual atheist but I still handed my kiddo (read to at night) all three of the aforementioned holy texts to give him a well-rounded approach as he was growing up. (Okay, I did ban South Park for a few years so call me a bad mother if you want to.)

My problem is not with the books - it’s with any teacher who would cram the contents down a child’s throat. Books are there to expand the mind, not to choke on.

Teachers, leave your own religion, politics and sexual persuasion at home and answer questions thoughtfully. Don’t use books as a brainwashing prop. Thank you.

Josiah Watson

When examining the standard of censorship, or prohibition, of literature in a public academic setting, it is important that such standards remain uniform in nature.

Should holy texts qualify for restriction under the same qualifications, then their restriction is necessary--regardless of the affiliated religion. In terms of the comparative analysis of religions, it is generally inappropriate for such study to precede secondary education, and more appropriately found in postsecondary education.

Regardless of the enforcement of any "moral laws" which qualify religious literature for restriction, the comparative analysis of religions in an academic and professional setting should exempt texts from restriction, for only such purpose.

Utopian

Christ was very clear about separation of church and state, he stated render unto Caesar that which is Caesar (the State), and unto God that which is Gods (the Church). The founders of our Country were also very clear on Separation of Church and State, look at what happened when church and state were intertwined it was a destructive, have we not learned anything from history of the World, the reason this country was founded was so that we could have freedoms, it not wise to mix oil and water or gasoline and a match.

Coleen Gay Walker

I'm not in to banning books. I was reading about the French Revolution in 5th grade. I was reading Asimov in 6th. But no wisdom tradition should be given precedence in public institutions. Sunday school was where I learned the beliefs and traditions of the religion I was raised in.

Audrey Hwang

I believe in the separation of church and state. That being said, our "Pledge of Allegiance", paper currency etc all say, "In God We Trust".
This is a complex issue, however it needs to be addressed and there needs to be dialogue that is of a critical thinking nature vs an angry and shortsighted-overly simplistic view.

I do not believe in banning books. Books inspire, create and develop each and every one of us. Some are unable to bring such religious texts into their homes due to circumstances, so they find solace reading outside of their homes.

No one should be denied access to any religious text nor knowledge they are interested whether it is to pursue or to just be knowledgeable about.

I believe that the person who brought up the points re the Bible was counteracting the "Christians" re their hypocrisy, arrogance and hatred to make a point. I can understsand that and I do not blame nor hold anything negative re that individual.

To ban, is to demolish and disrespect therefore causing grief, anguish and anything but virtue, understanding and love.

NO religion/faith/beliefs are above any others.

Dan Anderson

I find it almost fascinating how riled people get regarding banning of certain books from school and public libraries. It is nothing new.

In 1972, the Placentia-Linda Unified School District in California actually banned Jonathan Livingston Seagull because "it hints of the concept of reincarnation." It happens to be far less 'poisoning the minds' of people than some of the concepts found in KJV1611.

Rev Ned

Why not ban it and the Qur an? More people have been harmed, through the ages, by the content of the Bible and Qur a than by any other two books, EVER!

Deborah Jean Frankum Perkins

yes. Not everyone subscribes to the same spiritual path.

Carol Lynn Kulkens

The Bible should 100% be banned from the public school system. Religion doesn't belong in a system with diversity. Why risk alienating people and their beliefs. That's why laws were made to keep religion and State separate. Why is this even a question?

Paul Christian Gibson

The bible should not be banned. That said, Brave New World, To Kill A Mockingbird, and all the other amazing and brilliant books on the “banned” list should be in every library. Books are not evil. imposing your beliefs on the innocent, and taking away free will is!

John J. Beck

Just like most books, the bible should not be banned in public schools. Also, the bible should not be used for student assignments in public schools below 8th grade, in my opinion. It can be used with other resources when students are of an age that they are making judgements and understand poetry and metaphor. Bible assignements at younger ages could be construed as the school promoting a specific set of religious beliefs.

Rev. Russ Macomber

With diversity being what it is in the United States these days. Wouldn’t you have to make the Qur’an as well as the Bible and any other religious book available to students to study?

Let us not forget all be it fiction..,

In Ray Bradbury's 1953 novel Fahrenheit 451, a culture which has outlawed books due to its disdain for learning, books are burned along with the houses they are hidden in.

I pray we never come to this.

Michael Sledge

I believe in this, if you don't like it in schools then home school your children, oh wait that means I can't drop them and go do what u do daily. So then if not public schools one say I will just put them into private schools, which are basically catholic or somewhat religious. Leaving you again to tend to your children. Good luck trying to get them to understand the way of life which is basically given to you from the Bible. All of this starts in the home and if you can't get to it because your working a 60 hour work week this day and age, at least the schools could assist with the guidance to create wholesome young men and women. But for now the way it is, all I will say is listen to the music on the radio and television. That's what we are graduating out of our schools, no values, no self dignity or respect. World we have to gain back the control of our youth or we will be in a world of hurt.

Jeramie Brian Smith

The separation of church and state is vital for preventing the rise of a Theocratic Dictatorship….just check your history people, specifically the Inquisition and the Crusades.

Michael S. Russell

Any religion that pushes for the removal of books because they don't align with their teachings should have it's own books removed from the selves. There are so many descriptions of sex and murder that this book called "The Bible" that it falls into the category of what they want banned. We do not need a Theocracy as the government of the United States of America. With all the fear and contempt Christians and Catholics have sewn, both religions should be labeled as Hate Organizations in accordance to the law.

Renee J Bridges

From the beginning....being tempted to be like their Father (knowing ? from ?) was banned but the DESIRE to learn was overwhelming. Banning anything creates the curiosity as to WHY? Questions such as "what's wrong with it?" "what are you hiding?" ..."why don't you want me to know this?" etc.,etc. Restrictions created curiosity...and mankind has that in great abundance. As does the Creator. Our entire universe and every universe was a learning process of matter and gases in every conceivable way, shape, fashion and form. From an endless fasciation as to "what is this to become?" Banning things excites one's curiosity until it becomes a DESIRE...once fed, we seek it out again...almost like a drug. Most things can only be understood with time and maturity; with growth and changes. And the Bible is no different. We know it differently than when it had the "hidden meanings" of the dark ages! Any and all writings are open to interruption. And that's the beauty of it all! Children who have seen farm animals mating will not be surprised by sex ed. but anything out of the "norm" for some will be the DESIRE to know BECAUSE IT IS CONSIDERED "FORBIDDEN" ! Rather than what it is; the Soul's memory of a previous time, in a previous gender. (Now I know this will raise a lot of noise but there's an energy that makes this mud and blood form move and it's not just YOU but the spark of the Creative Force that exists thru out the universes. We call that energy Soul which is different from the energy that sparks the brain.) Back to topic....schools MUST teach our children how to SURVIVE in this world; parents must teach them there is more to this world than meets the eye! Holding either back will only do them great harm and slow down our blessed evolution!

Ari Joseph Bertine

If it's appropriate to ban any books from schools, "The Holy Bible" should certainly be included by the banning guidelines. Religious significance should not give it a pass from qualifying traits. This should be a big hint to people that no books should ever be banned because "offensive" is a subjective concept.

William Morehead

Parents should be responsible for bringing their kids up to know what world they live in. Whats really being said here is that these parents don't want to have to deal with guiding their kids through a world they themselves do not understand. Parents,educate yourselves on how best to talk with your kids about these topics. Don't be bigots and do not teach them to hate those who would identify as someone other than yourselves. Teach your kids how to be an attractive example of their beliefs. So that outsiders would see what they stand for and willingly want to participate.

Christiana Elizabeth Ostrander

I am a reader of all sorts of books, I went to a religious school, and a public school. I feel no book should be banned from schools, libraries, or any location anyone can obtain information for learning and entertainment for mind, body, and soul. I also feel past books should not be edited, because someone is "to sensitive" about our ancestors, and the cruelty that they did to others. If we don't learn from our past, we are all destined to repeat it.

Joseph A Caron

I believe ALL religious texts should be available to ALL people. Maybe grade school is a little early to understand the context of the literature and the time it was written. High school age children should have access to all religious literature. They can than reach their own conclusions, provided that they are aware of time and context. Sometimes some guidance may be helpful in that respect.

Stuart Gale Talley

Bibles should not be banned anywhere. The teachings in the Bible are the foundation of ethical peaceful society.

John Ash McCormick

Why do any of you keep arguing with the fanatics?

Some people are terrified of dying, terrified of living if they have to think for themselves, and quite often terrified of women in general.

They don't reason in the sense of most people, they merely react based on a few ossified "truths" they have been taught since childhood, indoctrinated so deeply in a psychosis that they don't dare to actually consider that they might be wrong.

That's why they just keep repeating the same nonsense and work so hard to control women, sex, and their children as well as everyone else.

They happen through history burning witches, trying to take over governments so they can force other people to do and live exactly they way they want.

Think about how feudal Japan operated, samurai believed in a horrible ethic and all the rest of the population believed they were correct because it is the only thing they were taught from birth.

Most of you can think of other examples from history and from modern life.

They believe that they and their few fellows are the only real humans and have the only correct way to believe and behave. That they have a divine right and mandate to "fix" or eliminate everyone else.

Arguing with them, pointing out where they are so wrong simply wastes your time and reinforces their belief that they are persecuted by every other person with a different belief system.

You can't argue someone out of a psychosis, you can only annoy them and everyone else by trying.

They do not believe in evidence so explaining things to them just makes them certain you are headed for hell.

Many religions don't have a hell but the ones which do tend to breed fanatics.

I'm a trained mathematician and physicist so I seek evidence.

I also know that showing evidence to a fanatic only annoys them.

John Ash McCormick

When I read some of the comments I always wonder how people can read any version of The Bible and forget that the Jesus himself wasn't a "christian", in the New Testament Jesus was a Jew.

As a Jew he didn't believe in damnation, hell, or forcing others to "believe" in him or anything in anything like the sense that evangelicals do today..At the worse Jewish "hell" is a condition where the person is ashamed of things they have done.

In fact, the Bible is made up of various Jewish documents and even today rabbis are arguing about whether a non Jew can enter an afterlife. Rabbi is not a priest, he, and a few shes now, is a teacher, an interpreter of religious law.

According to the Bible, Jesus just wanted everyone to be nice to everyone else, which is enough to get you nailed to a tree even today.

Rev. Dr. Father JJ

people here are conveniently overlooking one little fact; these things are ALWAYS about the kkkris chn bibble (and probably a very specific version at that)

it is NOT about exposure to ALL religions, rather it is always about exposure to kkkristinsanity (and probably a very specific version at that)

and the reason there is/was a discussion about banning the (probably a very specific version of) bibble was in retaliation to these kkris chins being offended by books in school libraries that mention or discuss same-sex families, gay/lesbian BTQ+ questions or issues, even books that discuss how racism has affected this (US) country, or abortion, even women working.

the kkkrsitofascists are out to create a theocracy exactly along the lines of the taliban in afghanistan. morals police, fashion police, woman's place is in the home, the man is the provided

Brother, Rob

Land of the free, to choose what we want, if we decide to keep the bible in schools, we need to have all religions in the schools then, not just one, to keep it equal for all. So that's one of the reasons bibles shouldn't be in schools,

Edward D Torres

Creationism using the Bible backed by the science of Intelligent design is what we are promoting in the Public Schools. Evolution as the only explanation of Origin has been debunked with 21st Century Discovery of our DNA and RNA.

ServantOfJudgement

It's 2024. If a kid wants to read a Bible he can download one. His parents can buy. He can buy one. It's easy.

It's just as easy for a kid to get all the LGBTQIA++ materials they want with video instructions on the stuff. The ladder is known to cause addiction but it's still at the touch of a tablet.

If humans want something and it's available, they'll get it. No big deal.

When schools instruct in either of these two they're flawlessly fitting the definition of indoctrination.

Let's just stick with reading, writing, arithmetic, history and practical science.

Aaron Shayda

Kids go to school to learn to read and write. I don’t think religion in any form should be taught in school. Same with any topic that is even a bit controversial. Politics, sexuality, religion should all be taught at home by parents. Schools need to stay in their lane. Let parents parent and schools teach reading, writing and math.

Don’t misinterpret what I’m saying. My point is parents need to step up more and be more involved in their kids lives. Be there to answer the tough questions according to the family units beliefs.

Peter Reynolds

I think religion should be taught in school. I don't agree with lgbtq+ , I think anyone marrying same sex or preaching that it is ok is not understanding of the bible. This includes the pope.

Veronica Jonesclemente

There are many faiths and one faith should not be ban not as far as in public schools unless it is a public catholic or Christian school the Bible should not be allowed in the school teaching because how it will affect and offend people not of that religion and faith

Sheila Aloma Mercado

I think the Bible should stay in schools and be available as a religious text along side other religious texts. The Quran, the Torah, books on all world religions.
I believe it is time to take an “all or nothing” attitude when it comes to religion in our secular schools. Either we expose our students to all religions so they can make informed decisions about their faith or we remove all texts on religion and leave that teaching for their parents.

Jane A. Weir

If the public schools offer world religions study, yes.

John Alex Paxson

IN GOD WE TRUST ... (it does not say what or whose God) ... keep all books ... the parents have to do their job instead of trying to blame and put the responsibility on someone or something else ... certain countries have their own language, laws. rules, beliefs and culture ... when you jump ship and run to another country (because some people are afraid to try and change their own country to something ... Better?) ... then you must speak that countries language and abide by its rules and regulations and not try to change it for your own liking. Grow up humanity, and learn some common sense ... If at all possible.

Jesse Elliot Goff

My comment is simple. First amendment. The freedom of religion without the "fear" of persecution. Removing any religious texts is a violation of this if even 1 individual says they want it there. A simple solution...place it in the same section every library I have been in has that is regulated. Even schools have had it way back in the 70's when I was a kid. You had the Liberian regulating which books the younger children checking out.

Malcolm J. Mitchell

No, the Bible should never be ban from our schools. Like any History Book the Bible is a History of Christianity.

Kevin James Bogan

The bible’s a book of short stories some of which are arguably fiction. So, there’s really no reason to ban it or require it. Let teachers & students use it judiciously to make points, stimulate discussion & encourage intellectualism. It’s not the word of god. Please…

Thomas Broadway

I personally feel that the BIBLE should be allowed in the schools. I was raised with it in schools and it didn't hurt anyone then.

Marie Hampton

Good day all! I believe that all books have value! To skew information to one viewpoint leads to bias critical thinking not pure, open minded thought where you can apply critia with critical thinking skills, also found in books of different ways to think about whatever subjects are proposed. To comprehend, ponder, debate, talk with each other not at each other would benefit us all. Critical thinking is how you form your understanding of any subject. Not criticizing, berating or belittling another's person for their analysis of subject(s) as far too many people die from someone else's beliefs). Instead shouldn't we all consider, discuss and delve to understand ourselves and our viewpoints with acceptance of conflicting opinions. We are all here together as ordained humans and like it or not we are all on a bell curve some far out of center, some who are like minded with much yet to learn. Creation or evolution? How can we truly know anything without being open to change of viewpoint with new information! Is the world still flat NO, is our Earth the center of the universe NO, so with new information and new criteria we form new opinions or ideas about ourselves and our surroundings. Isn't this our purpose for living, our creation and our evolution, to further our growth in understanding and acceptance?! To judge another isn't as necessary as is understanding ourselves in relating to another, in my humble opinion, otherwise we are only obstinate or stuck, closed to possibility(ies). Death to the wrong side of your line only puts an end to possibility. Could both be true? Evolution and Creation, I mean, or is science not looking for the God particle as we speak!? Argument is to be right but, reading, writing and discussion is to seek understanding... Open the library door and you'll find fiction next to non fiction but, should we curtail any or all? Read and learn the author's view, then open the table to discuss what you got from the work, as well as, others at the same table will have slightly or completely different reviews or analysis of the same information. Might be a good thing to think for yourself as it gets tempered in the heat of talk and doused with cold views as no one ever agrees fully. Accept the great outcome of the other and yourself because maybe it will congeal into a mutual understanding of the material. Sister Marie

Caroline Acosta

in my opinion yes let me explain why which Bible, we have freedom of religion and speech, and there’s a separation between our government and religion. They did it for the churches not for the guy. The problem with the Bible is there are so many different religions that which one are you gonna allow in schools since we have a separation of church and state absolutely no religious material in the schools of course is my opinion, religion should be taught. It should be taught at church not at school.

Ronald Joseph Dent

The United States government and the citizens of America have forsaken God long ago. Religion always fails. Relationship with God is uniquely individual. Parent's responsibility to raise their children was taken away by vote of citizens of America through the respective state and federal government. The Bible in most versions is of great historical, sociological studies, political, economic and civics (political interaction of citizens to government) educational value. Compulsory prayer was removed in schools supported by the Supreme Court and justifiably so, no person should be compelled to pray to a God or god they do not believe in, individual prayer was not and cannot be taken, but can be persecuted. We witness the indoctrination of children in America's today. To confuse a child is simple, just present the indoctrination statement as fact three times. Any nation that forsakes it's children is doomed. America does not educate it indoctrinates. Teaching what to think is quite different than teaching how to think. What do you think?

Father Frederick

The banning of texts has been paramount in the history of the world. What is one man's honey is another's poison. And while one man's words are brilliance, to another they are perverted, dangerous, and grossly incorrect.

Having said that, there is a dark danger to the suppression of words, and dare I say that one comes from the church, and the other from government.

From the church comes the means and desire to control the religious narrative. As we have seen in several "books" which were not included in the Bible, the inconvenience and ignorance of the author's words becomes reason for banning. And to a local extent, we had a rather nasty (turning physical) fight over which form of the Bible is the correct version, and which version may be used in the church. To see people lose their minds over a book is odd, and at the same time frightening.

From the government perspective, we know that government wants to be "helpful" and select what its citizens are allowed to read. Sometimes it's well meaning, (as in the prohibition of pornography books in public schools), but most of the time it's like those fighting over the various versions of the Bible, or those faiths trying to prove their religion is better than your choice of religion. And let's be honest, we have all seen the fights in politics with the news and social media control of the narrative. I think have our preferred candidates, but government's malfeasance in the topic has proven to me that they are 100% untrustworthy and incapable of managing what we read and see. Clearly, government should do what it was designed to do by the founding fathers, which is to manage the assets and media between states. Nowhere does it say government shall protect citizens from words, thoughts, or opinion.

Ergo, if one prohibits one text from access in public schools, and public places, then all texts which people feel are offensive should be removed. BTW, in some schools this would make the library the size of a closet. Does anyone remember the controversy over the book "Curious George", the little monkey?

Personally, I think in the public eye, all texts should be available without any bans or limits. The only limit would be a parent's suspension of access to a minor based on Family Belief system, but then that requires parents to be parents, and not cede the responsibility to bureaucrats and malcontents in government.

I'm reminded of my younger days in religious studies when asking for access to the Book of Enoch, and was told by the instructor "never ask for that again." One has to question why suppression of writing creates such a hostile reaction. Why can't I read it?

John Robert Wobrock

Comment removed by user.

Minister Holly B Lovey

They only want to ban the bible because it is what is right. Too many want to make right be wrong so they can continue to do wrong without a guilty conscience or answering for it. To pretend something wrong is right still doesn't make it so. The Devil has always wanted to destroy our children and if you have read the Word, it is true! Leave the bible in the schools and libraries. Grown-ups shouldn't be allowed to strip the world of Godly knowledge, should be banned! It should not be your choice! If you choose to follow Satan then you chose that. You have no right to make that choice for everyone else.

Kathy Imhausen

Years ago when the Bible could me read in school, things were different. The children showed more respect, less discipline problems. We need to get back to the basis this country was founded on. Which is God. I am a former special education teacher.

TyffM

I believe that EVERYONE should be able to choose their own religion, and the Bible SHOULD be in schools to give the option of learning about Christianity. I'm so sick of seeing how "oh I'm offended" it literally does not harm you in any way for a freaking book to be in a school 🙄 if you don't like something, don't look at it, or don't pay attention to it.. it's not that hard!!

William J Burton

My personal opinion is, that the Bible, Quran, writings by His Holynes the Dahlia Lama and other religious texts should be available in school Libraries only. Then they should be filed in the reference section. Along books on the subject of religion in general the history of religion and how religion shaped developed and shaped of human civilization and culture.

Terry Oliver Adkinson

No books should be banned. Perhaps restricted by age, but none should be banned.

Sandra Free -Owens

Growing up I carried a bible every I went. Reading some of the comments on here seriously makes me rethink getting my clergy through Universal Life Church. Who would ever under any reason want to ban the Bible? If the Bible is banned from schools does that mean the Christian students will be crucified like the Jewish students are now just for being who they are?

Jerry J. Davis

As long as other religious texts are allowed, so should the Christian bible be allowed. Most religions have a common past and theme, and even from a non-religious standpoint are important glimpses into the past and our history of development as a society and as a species.

Quinn R Amaro

This is simple. If the Bible is banned from a public school library, then ANY book that is even remotely controlling the spiritual thoughts of a child in public schools, those must also be removed. But please never forget that the United States of America's first government was based on the words if the Bible.

Catherine Schaefer

Banning books creates a slippery slope. There are children’s bibles so why not put a copy or two on the shelf in the grade school? A copy of the adult bible is fine for high schoolers. Personally, I believe the bible or any religious book from another religion is dangerous but banning books sets a bad precedent.

Sharett M Cardenas

No I don't think the Bible should be banned, it's a history of the pass and it's the revelation of the future. What has been on the pass shall be a part of the future.

Obadele Bomani

To be honest...Yes!

Let the children be free of expression and thought and as an adult we have no right to force an idiology they dnt even resonate with until its taught to them...Leave the kids alone and let them decide which direction the creator want them to follow...We have been misinformed and miseducated...and they can see that corruption because they are innocent and pure...why not protect that aspect we wish we could have back and let it grow naturally. Maybe our world can finally get the peace it really needs! Music should be placed back in schools because it alone can treat illness of the mind body and we do this with Mudras, chakra chants which my kids love because it helps them de-stress from outside external forces disturbing their natural order to nature.

Hope that makes sense!

Dena Oliver

I love you family, Everyone have a great, great day! We are a small part of the population. But together our voices scream louder! Minister Dena

Gary Lynn Rhoades

Everything that's in the Bible. We hear or read on the news.i think we need more religion in classes and get rid of cell phone usage unless it's for 911 calls.children today that's all they know.thwy bring the phone to the dinner table.theres no real family time.lets bring back the old values we had years ago.

Alan R Chiappa

Whether you consider it religious text or not, the fact is, the Bible is a history book. Same goes for the Torah and the Quran. No different than books about the Vietnam war, the Holocaust, the Great Depression, Racism, or the Crusades. They are all accounts of what happened in the past. We learn from the past, at least we are supposed to. Too many people today are trying to erase history because somewhere, something happened that was an insult to a particular race, gender, color, creed, etc. Erase it and we will make the same mistakes again and again. Libraries are full of history books with references to religion. Most wars were fought over religious beliefs and some accounts are pretty graphic. Remove one, then you must remove them all, because someone will always find something offending somewhere. Take many of the Disney stories for example. I grew up on these. They teach valuable lessons, yet some find them hurtful. Society is really getting ridiculous with it's self importance. If you don't want your kids exposed to certain literature, then be a parent and accompany your children to the library, or home school them and leave history where it belongs, accessible to everyone and anyone interested in it.

Teresa Marie Cordova

Just like many history books, the Bible is filled with a lot of misinformation and was used to control the masses through fear. If it is something you want your kids to follow, at home or in your church is where it would be appropriate. No disrespect intended.

James Tom Bailey

Absolutely NO to the banning of the Bible! In fact I believe it should be in every school library in its many translations and versions.

Robin Anne Hannon

Banning books is like standing on the edge of a cliff waiting to fall off. However, the Bible should be read and taught at home, or if you are an ardent Christian, in a private school. The USA is a melting pot of many religions. As you have seen, open the door and it's like the little dutch boy at the dam sticking his finger in a leak. As to Satanism, do what you please, it's your life, your business, but please don't shove it down my throat, or my children's throat.

Vicki L Hahn

Schools are an institution for learning and there are a lot of children that don’t have access to bibles to learn from in their homes (permanent or temporary), emergency shelters, or other placement facilities. If “In the beginning GOD created”, “In GOD We Trust” (the National motto of the United States for which we reside, our money, emergency vehicles, even some businesses and buildings in our communities express by whom we were created and who to trust, then our schools at very least, should offer learning about the Holy Bible to children, which are so precious to GOD, Our Father and Our Creator.

Ralph Thompkins

I feel all Holy books should be studied in High School by every one. Open minds make for a better society.

Denise Damen

I do believe in the separation of church and state. But my suggestion is do not ban the bible (don't preach it or have school prayer) but include all the world religion's books in the school library. Why only the Christian book? Why not the Qur'an, the Bhagavata Gita, Tao Ti Ching, etc. That would make for a more well-rounded education. And doesn't it say in the Constitution that the government protects the freedom of speech and the practice of all religions?

Earle Arthur Allen Jr.

YES ! the Bible SHOULD NOT BE IN SCHOOLS NOR RELIGIOUS CURRICULUM BE ALLOWED. keep Church n state SEPARATE!

Richard White

Secular books glorifying deviancy is different then a book explaining the horrors of adultery and unnatural acts that spread disease and negate the family bond. RuPaul is not a role model Jesus Christ is. Look what's happened since the prayer was taken out of schools. We need Christ Jesus more then math science English or social studies. We need all that but if people don't change their ways their gonna have terrible lives and eternity in hell.

John Henry Kennon

The bible should not be banned. As a matter of fact, prayer should be put back in school. All of this "politicaly correct" stuff has to stop. Just because it may offend a small group does not give them the right to take away the teachings of the bible.

Rev. Elizabeth

If they are talking about the bible being in a school library, yes, I feel it should be allowed. Christians are already teaching their children so this won’t be a shock to them and they would have been taught to read the New Testament, preferably beginning with ACTS, but I suggest reading Matthew and on while I educate them that Matthew, Jesus is still alive. He dies in Acts and the New Testament enters into the Christian lives. Read through Revelations. Then read from Genesis and on to the New Testament. That is history. When I read it I didn’t like God at all. Of course I feel differently now. We need to know where we are right now in life and read on. Then revert to the history.

I also advocate for all religions and spiritual beliefs to be allowed in the school libraries as well. The diverse information for all who want to read it is good and healthy for the mind. We all should be aware of other people’s belief system, the way they were raised. I have read other religions books and many are similar to the. Christian Bible, especially the Quran(sp?).

Minister Paul

Taking bibles out of school is just what Satan wants and the communist left wing in office so they can truly rule the way our kids are taught they have been doing this since they took prayer out of school keep it so you can learn all religions and make your own decision

Matthew Daniel

There is absolutely no good reason to ban the Bible in schools! If for no other reason than it’s a collection of teachings regarding molality, which the entire country is running short on these days. I don’t think it should be forced on anyone. However, it should be an optional elective. It shouldn’t be any more offensive than metal shop.

Jamie Frost

Put all religious books in the library.. if kids are interested, they'll seek them out themselves.... This is the 1700s anymore America isn't a Christian/protestant country.... That's one of the reasons why America was founded... To be other denominations..... Now we have other religions... To bring the bible into the classroom is disrespectful and almost hateful toward other CHILDREN of different beliefs.

Viviana Aviya Rai

I certainly think the king James version should be band and the original bible should be welcome back into not just school also homes churches and all four corners of the earth. It is now that the true teaching is needed. There's so much False doctrine spread throughout the world. To were the proper teaching is being held up. With the condition of the people in the world I would dare so it's the devil. It's the missing direction to keep the people kept and in disconnection with higher source, the creator of all things. I think this way towards every act that dose not align with the conscious enlightment to higher self.

Warren Calvin Wall

I have no problem with addressing age appropriate materials in public schools. No religious materials should be introduced in K-8 schools. I believe that comparative religious studies would be appropriate for 9-12 grades as an elective. Even an advanced course for specific religions after the comparative studies prerequisite. Again, as an elective and not part of the required curriculum. All it really takes is a bit of common sense, granted, that it's a commodity in short supply today. There are plenty of studies that have absolutely no place in the curriculum of public schools and plenty that are crucial that have been removed. The entire U.S. public school system needs a vast overhaul. It is comparable to a very buggy computer operating system that has been hacked and loaded with viruses and malware. It needs so many corrections that the current system could not survive.

Anthony William Ellison

The Bible is the blueprint of humanity. The so-called pornography the people assume is in it is really part of the seven averages that we must overcome. The same with the violence. You cannot overcome something without first understanding that it exists. Therefore we must be aware of them, children should learn the difference between good and evil without having it whitewashed for them if the assistance of parents who really weren't raised right in the first place. Woe be unto those who call evil good and good evil, thus said Isaiah

Dr Rohn

I am a firm advocate of choice not mandatory regulation of what people can or cannot read, view, believe, or think. Make books available, at sign out, perhaps have a questionnaire seeking the reason the selection is being chosen. If such reason isn't sound then the book isn't checked out. Something like that other than taking choice away. Adults have a responsibility to help youths make informed decisions not making the decision for them.

Linda Callagy

NO THE BIBLE SHOULD NOT BE BANNED FROM SCHOOLS!!!!

Angelyn Joy Krout

It should be available in the library. If in a classroom, then by all means, ban it! Separation of church and State and all that. But by the same token, all of the books that were banned should be unbanned.

Darryl Duane Dusha

No! The U.S. constitution is based on the Bible and Christianity .And the most discriminated Religions in the U.S. today. A Jewish person can ware the Koppel. A Muslim Female can ware the Hijab. A Satanist can ware a shirt with the devil on his or her clothing . But a Christian can not ware anything concerning Christ without being kicked out of school. The U.S. needs to go back to it,s roots. And stop this attack on Christianity.

David McHaley

Look, if the other religions of homosexuality, evolution, science, and transgenderism can be taught, then so should the bible. Some will say that there's no proof that the Bible is true, but the same goes for the others. There's no proof that homosexuals are born that way, there's no proof that people are born in the wrong body, and science itself is based on theory, not fact. It's true until you prove it's not. I am in no way saying that these other religions are bad. I'm just saying fair is fair. If you're going to teach evolution, which is based on theory, then the alternative should be taught as well.

Jerry W Fitzsimmons

No.

Dalton Lynn Austin

Now there's going to always be a war over this so instead of commenting my concern of opinion let me ask a few questions what is the bible , merely nothing more than a book and ink. What contexts is inside that book alot of things not a single child should know about nor hear or see. Jesus Christ name is yewshua Spanish Latin, in biblical era there is taboo incest relationships with mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters until mosaic law of Moses, where is became wrong. Back to yewshua his mother Mary committed adultery and Titus made her and the child of Christ leave in which Mary had them joined the streets then Joseph had taken her in, yewshua father was a Roman Sargent, there is on the 1st page book of Genesis where it states. Worship no gods but me, that's I'm not quite how I would think that no other god or higher spirit exists and, sounds an lot like what in the book god describes as Satan. Now if we look at the church you see it together a lot of people including some of you here say I'm going or heading to church but your not your going or heading to meet with the church in which a deemanle fact is a cult by definition so before anyone else states their 2 sense make sure u comfortable having those conversations,

David A Trusky

Stop with banning the Bilbe

A.G Dolan

As the right wing of the Universal Life Church I would like to say as a Christian of course it’s abhorrent to even think about banning it but on the other hand this is exactly how it’s supposed to shake out. I’t is a bit tiring slogging through the lead up to the end times as it just gets lousier and lousier this is a very important time to have faith in god and recognize there is nothing to worry about as we have the millennial reign coming up.

Paul Wallace

The Bible is a book. Pure and simple, it is just a book. Some folks swear by it, while others swear at it. I figure you leave it on the shelf, and let the reader decide. However - the Karan belongs on the shelf as well, and for the same reason. If someone wants to put the 10 Commandments on the wall in the classroom, fine. But, make a space for followers of other religions as well. I'm sure one can find good words to live by that have been written by Mohammad, The Dalai Lama, as well as many others. The courts have already ruled that separation of church and state is only crossed when the Judeo-Christian ethic is the only religion represented. IMHO this isn't rocket salad surgery.

Eric A. Asplund

No I don't think the bible should be banded because it is his true word from God..

Rudolph M Garza

I personally do not have any problem with the Bible or other such books from other religions being in public schools so long as the intent is not to proselytize and these books are left in the library as a reference giving students a chance to explore their faith or the faith of others.

Class rooms, however, should be for reading, writing, and arithmetic, pure “academic”.

Michael Jerome Carr

The Bible and other religious/spiritual texts should be in schools for study, use, and sharing. Did we forget the place is called school a place of learning? Nothing should be banned if it’s exposes our children to what they will be exposed to known and to parents in the word. With the assistance of responsible educated adults and Teachers children can be exposed to sensitive and complexed information just make it age appropriate or and at the proper time in the development of a child and teen. We are seriously dumbing down our children not only culturally but with basic knowledge that is important to know to navigate the world. We do our children a disservice to ban anything they will face. Why not expose in a safe place of learning with supposedly teaching professionals that are changed with preparing our children for the world not to just survive and have information for testing but to thrive and change the world for the better to evolve into better beings of inspiration and wisdom. They should know business to why racism/prejudice/phobias exists and how to change those dynamics for better relations among peers and improving global relationships. We can’t have our children learning with narrow minded views and stunted understanding of how the word moves.

Kevin Venteicher

no one should have the right too religion do thay need a bible though is the answer and question id like too bring up att question i was understanding as long as you beleive in any thing in life or gods lords angels you are able too pray anywhere and will being looked att them all from the heavans hell heaven parralles dementions space galaxy and beyond

Patricia Ann Gross

Personally, I don't believe that The Bible, or any other religious book should be banned in school libraries just because they are religious texts so long as they are not considered required reading. If one religion is included, then any religion that wants to make its texts available in this way should also be included. They all, however, should be held to the same standard as any other book in the library. The stories of Noah and the flood, David and Goliath, and the beheading of John the Baptist all contain gratituous violence, and the Song of Solomon is quite erotic. If you want to eliminate books that contain these types of stories, plus polygamy, adultery with concubines and prostitutes, and slavery, you have the holy grail of all of these in The Holy Bible (pun intended).

Pastor Andrew John Lanham

No the Bible should be in all schools

Dominique D Sweat

i been fighting for this since i was 6 grade and then thee school started getting me in school suspendtion but that didnt stop me

John Robert Wobrock

Amen 🙏 and Full Respect 🙏

Zahra Dilley

If you allow the bible in the school, then you allow all books and walks of faith in the school, not just one!!!

Richard James Holden

Banning books depending on someone's own personal values is an incredibly poor way of dealing with issues. You create division and drive topics underground rather than in the open and, of course, to open and honest debate. Putting you fingers in your ears and saying, "no I am not listening" when you morally disagree with something is incredibly foolish and people who do this need to man/women up" and deal with it openly. It is not helpful. When Hitler ordered the burning of books, the ideas they represented did not go away.

Amanda Ann Davison Cole

The freedom to read what you choose should be just as important at the freedom to talk. Everyone has the right to their own opinion. Parents should educate their children of the dangerous things, the nudity, the violence. My children were born and raised into young adults. They knew what a penis and vagina were when they were 5 years old. They knew what good touch and bad touch mean. They knew what sex was by the age of 12. And knew that it is not a shameful act. It is an act of love and honor. My children have graduated high school. Some are in relationships some are not. They have the freedom to choose who they want to be, whether they have a partner or not. Only one of my children is not a virgin the rest are. So respect the opinions of eachother but also note that books should not be banned sole because they “offend” certain people. Educate about books.

Linda P Dettler

The Bible, like all other books is there for children to learn from if they desire. Banning books should be banned from school, or to only take out the sexual explicit or extremely violent ones. If kids need to learn from those, and the parents who allow children to read that stuff are the ones who would alllow the children to look it up on their phones or go to a public library to find it.

Jerry Leon Hamrick

No the Bible should not be ban from any public place or location

Diane R Sica

There is a reason that the Constitution specifies a separation of church from state. Religion is intrinsically personal and not something that can be taught in school. Individuals should have the right to practice the faith of their choice or NOT! Not everyone has a deep seated fear of death which is required for faith.

Robert C Fournier

God loves all.

Salemni Minarayah Greystormsong

All religious books should be banned from school, if you're interested in it you should seek it out yourself, while you're in school you should focus on your studies and on the reality of this world instead of focusing on the spirit world and the entities in it.

Sherrill White

You can not remove God Jesus I Christ from anything. He Created it, it belongs to Him, no matter what it is.

—HOLY SPIRIT VIRGIN QUEEN MOTHER CREATOR ZEUS I GOD ELIZABETH I CHRIST WHITE ROCKEFELLER MICHAELANGELO BURTON NETANYAHU MORGADO SOARS

Michael Warren Smith

To ban the Bible would be the flame needed to also ban any kind of publication that discusses ethics, morals, and situations of growth that can be confusing for many lost soaks in need of comfort, guidance, and real life experience solutions.

Kyu Tee Lee

The Quran is allowed in schools so why are they only trying to ban the bible. The bible and quarn and any religious book has its place so long as ot is for self study and not taught by a teacher. It is why religiois books are in the libraries so students can check them oit to read privately for self study. Should we allow the otjer religious bokks in as well? So long as they are for self study and no one is forcing rmthe book or religion on a student. I also believe the bible I checked out from my school library saved me from committing suicide at age 14. No one told me it was there and I happened to be drawn in that direction and say the holy bible there. So I would ask those who want it taken out of the school libraries of they want a rise in teen suicides and shootings. There is a boy who would have shot up fellow sumtudents and teachers in his highschool and the bible at the school library changed his heart. So tell me if the other religious books are already there like the Quran, Scientology books, and even wicca. Why do they want to remove the Holy Bible in a manner that is pure prejudice? Isnt it time they were charged legally for stopping the freedom of religious choice?

Rebecka Johnson

The "Bible" is a part of history. But, so is spiritual religion, Buddhism, Greek mythology, and so on. The "Bible", however, was more of guidelines and historical events of Jesus, aka "King of the Jews". Every king has a place in history that needs to be passed down through the generations. The "Bible" has been re written so many times that Christians themselves, are falling astray from it. Teaching the Bible should stay in the churches but the teachings of Jesus and his time should be incorporated into history lessons as should the spiritual guides as well. We also need our children to learn of the indigenous ways. If we all come together with peace and love, as Jesus would want, we can accomplish great things!

Henry Gordon. Weed

There is a separation between church and state for a reason. The stare should not have any authority when it comes to regions matters or anything Involving the church. But this is only my opinion.

Stanley Post

The Bible is one of the oldest history books in existence no reason to band history I know the government has tried to edit history and history books in the past and will probably try again don't let them

Curtis Wade Beard

The Bible should not be banned from public schools, nor should it be mandated. it should be offered and taught age appropriately. Just like any other textbook. As for banning other books because of their content that is not acceptable. However, books and literature in general should be available on an age appropriate basis. By the time students are in high school, there should be very few limits on content.

Lorri J Hillhouse

I do not think the bible should be banned from schools. A lot of people have turned away from God. They really need to bring him back to school along with the bible. learning age apprropriate is the way.

Scott F. Transue

Lol. What's the point of banning books? Evil is now made available everywhere. Check out social media. Go to a gay pride parade. Seriously look at what American morality has become. Look at a world that worships money while letting people starve. We have the privilege of having our faith tested and it only gets worse from here. These are the times fortold to us. The Bible should be mandatory reading, along with the Tora and koran. But devotion to God can't be pushed upon people. Either you have it or you don't. Unfortunately many are lost in an effort to find instant fame on tic toc. God bless, good luck.

Ta'Juanna Marie Denmark Alves'

As a former public-school educator responding to the question of "should the Holy Bible be banned from public school libraries", I recall I was in 5th grade when I found myself curious about religion. Specifically, I wanted to read for myself all of the Sunday school stories found inside of the Bible which was told. I eventually grew up reading the bible from front to back which took me 1 year and 1 day to do so. At the same time, because I was trying to find religion in my own life, while reading the bible, I would compare it with other religious books, which I did find similarities and differences (most of these books/bibles were found in a public library). I even went to the school library and checked out a Oui Ja Board book in 8th grade because some of my peers were playing with one bought from Walmart. I just wanted to know more about the board, regardless of the stories I heard about it. The library was my discreet way of settling curiosity as a child, which has assisted in who I have become today (I am 60 years young). Because these books were available to me as a child throughout my school years, I now study Buddhism as a philosophy of life with quantum physics, which fits with my Native American Spiritual cultural. So, from my experience, I feel that ALL books should be available to students as a resource and tool for study purposes or a source of curiosity. School is for learning and I, as that small 5th grader, was allowed to use free will (and with parents' permission) to pull those books off the shelf of a public-school library. It is up to the parents to tell the child not to read certain things out of the public-school libraries and not to bring them home, but for others, who do not have the resources at home, should be allowed to read them. By the time they are 18 (around the age of high school graduation), most children are already going to have a concept of what is in a certain book, whether it is religious material or not. School is where I found that most Atheist just want to be the best they can be on a daily basis and do not dwell on what happens with the afterlife (a 9th grade student taught me and a whole class of high schoolers that). Ignorance is the problem with most who do not want to learn about the interest of others (especially when it comes to religion or culture) for understanding. Learning about others makes a more positive diverse culture of understanding and tolerance.

Robert Chokonen Anthony Van Fleet

Sure there are many aspects to mull over as there are viewpoints, when censorship raises it ugly head then free will goes out the window. If parents don't want thier children to read it, or any book then it is thier perogative, but to lend that assertion on others is lending to disaster.

Robert Randolph Walker

Some people, I my opinion, do not understand what the separation of government and religion means. It does not mean a total absence of religion ion government premises or anything like that. What it means is the government may not create a state religion. Prayer in schools and all that is OK because it, is not a state religion.

Minister Holly B Lovey

The Holy Bible is all that is left that has everything we need in it. From life to death and all in between. As it is known as fact, bad has always tried to take over good. I will choose to read my bible in spite of anyone elses views. Those who choose not is on them but no one is going to take away my right inside my home and outside of my home. God's teaching in the Bible are my teachings to those near me and sometimes to those afar. For sure, people who don't believe in God will not agree and the Bible also tells us that and goes further on to tell us that some will not believe to the degree of eternal burning. I am not surprised. Just don't tell me that I cannot believe in the Holy Word of God and I will teach it to those who don't have it that are willing to learn it. Banning the Bible, "to me" is not the answer or is not in comparison to banning of others. The Holy Bible has all of history in it from beginning to end so why would anyone ban it? Everything is there. I don't and will never agree to banning the Holy Bible.

Deborah Hensley

I don't agree with the banning of books,yes I worry that the Bible will be next,we all need to be praying and speaking out about this

James McDonald

The greatest thing about the United States is our freedom of choice. Freedom is not your right to think and say what you will. Freedom is your willingness to defend anothers right to think and say what they will, even if you totally disagree with them. Americans need to learn that.

Mia Shay Emery

Some of your ministers are not Christian, like myself, so you're asking myself, whose faith is already banned from schools and rightly so as a priestess of my faith I dont believe any faith belongs in schools or government, if I feel Christianity should be an exception to that rule and I do not.

James G. Ward

I believe that in order to understand and even admire or respect other cultures we should All learn about each other. If the Bible is to be in the school systems, then we should also have access as learning tools, to all religions and this should begin with Judaism and Islam. We all want peace but when we limit our minds, hearts and most importantly what we believe then we will never have peace. I've heard that, "The heart wants what the heart wants", but there is more to the human experience than one human facet. In my heart and what I have for my fellow human is first love then a need to understand all others. I have gotten into trouble before because the world climate doesn't receive the questions I often have. I have asked people in my workplace and community to please tell me about their home or culture. I never bring up religion unless it is requested of me but in general people are afraid to share. I say we learn about all religion in order to understand other people's faith and why they believe what they do. banning the Bible is a mistake, instead we need to accept all religious texts except those based on illegal practices of course. I would recommend each school system or even educational government system consider and recommend this as the appropriate course of action. I know I am not wrong about the general idea of what I have shared but I welcome any changes to these suggestions.

Harris Kakoulides

The Bible should be taught in the schools

1) The Bible has been the source of many English literature like Shakespeare writings. Without it we wouldn't have the greatest classic that many study in English classes.

Shakespeare writtings has lots of Biblical imagery aswell .

For example in Macbeth

Act 1, Scene 2

Sergeant: Except they meant to bathe in reeking wounds, Or memorise another Golgotha (1.2.45)

This is clearly a reference to Christ death on the cross.

Act 1, Scene 7

Macbeth: If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well It were done quickly (1.7.1)

A reference to what Jesus told Judas at the last supper in John 13.27: "That thou doest, do quickly."

2) The Bible was a influence to form our United States Constitution and the Bill of rights for example

In United States Constitution "the Year of our Lord” is mentioned before its signatures.

Which Lord is it speaking about but the God of the Bible which was in reference.

3) The greatest scientist believed and was inspired by the Bible.

For example:

Isaac Newton 1643 to 1727. Passionate dissenting Protestant who spent more time on Bible study than math and physics. Profoundly changed our understanding of nature with his law of universal gravitation and his laws of motion; invented calculus; built the first ever reflecting telescope; showed sunlight is made of all the colors of the rainbow.

Darryl Duane Dusha

When the founding fathers put into the Constitution a Division of Church and State.The mentioned statement was not to allow the state to rule the church or the church to rule the state. It was not until 1963 in the case of Abington School district v. Schemp The Supreme Court ruled that MANDATORY Bible reading and the Lords prayer was unconstitutional. But students could still VOLUNTARILY say Silent prayers and read the Bible or other Religious texts on their free time. And form Religious clubs. Religious symbols such as the cross was to be permitted as long as it is not state sponsored . BANNING THE BIBLE ALL TOGETHER IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS OR NOT ALLOWING STUDENTS TO WEAR RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS SUCH AS THE CROSS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL .

Sherrill White

Here is how you will move on from the Completion of the Rapture of Demons, the End of Times,

1. We have no obligation to be fair to false religions, all others, but ours.

2. GOD JESUS I CHRISTS' CHURCH IS THE UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH. THERE IS NO OTHER.

3. The only Bible that will be used, after the Rapture of Demons for Eternity, is The FIRST TESTAMENT (OLD TESTAMENT including REVELATIONS,which was moved from the last book of the First Testament to the last book of the Second Testament (New Testament,) and The Third Testament, available on FB now, at God Elizabeth I White Rockefeller and King Father Creator God Jesus I Christ Rockefeller, and on Amazon in 90 days at $24.00.

4. There will be ONE RELIGION with its own traditions which are established by King Father Creator Zeus I God Jesus I Christ Rockefeller, The Torah Jewish Universalist Life of God Jesus I Moses. There will be no others. God's People automatically KNOW they belong.

5. No one had to be forced to do anything. The demons are gone entirely. There are no longer enemies or dissenters. You KNOW when you hear and see and read the WORD OF GOD JESUS I CHRIST. We accomodate no one, their is no other religion.

6. There is no indocrination. GOD JESUS I CHRISTs religion of 650 Universal Laws of God Jesus I Moses was implanted, into your Soul MemBrain, along with your Spirit at 3 months prior to your birth by GOD JESUS HIMSELF. YOU ALREADY KNOW. Refreshers will bring it all to the fore, you've been cast under by Alzheimers.

—God Elizabeth I White Rockefeller and King Father Creator God Jesus I Christ Rockefeller .

Sherrill White

God's 650 Universal Laws of God Jesus I Moses are on The Emerald Tablets, by Thoth, who was and is King Father Creator God Jesus I Christ Rockefeller.

April B

Books should be categorized according to maturity level just like movies/tv shows. If the parents are ok with certain texts, then ok. Just have permission slips signed if a book is deemed “questionable”. Then everyone is happy. It doesn’t have to be a big debate.

Ruth P Doughty

Here’s my two cents worth; the Bible should be available for those who have no access to it, and wish to read it, as should every other religious and spiritual “book”, across the board. If a parent has an issue with their kid reading said book, then it should not be allowed, on an individual basis.

John Ash McCormick

If you want decide if someone is open minded, have them consider Russell's teapot. (try wikipedia)

Simply put, one of the great philosophers of all times one who concentrated on epistemology pointed out the giant fallacy of people who believe in one god or another thinking others need to disprove their existence.

Anyone with an open mind and a touch of logic would see that the burden of proof always lies with the person claiming an undetectable, unprofitable, possibly mythical person, god, or object exists. Disproving something is usually impossible.

Where would you go to see that there is no god, person, or object there?

I have no problem with them believing something that can't be proven but strenuously object to them demanding others also share their personal beliefs.

That happened throughout history and always ended badly, in the middle ages it ended with about a million totally innocent women being burned to death to "save their souls."

Hitler demanded others hate Jews. That didn't turn out well for anyone, including Germany.

Then there were the crusades which several times resulted in christian cities being looted and burned by other Christians when they couldn't find infidels to burn.

Even pretending that The KJB makes for a peaceful happy population haven't noticed how badly that has worked in history and the more strongly religious the powerful are, the worse their actions against others who even slightly disagree.

Time to try something else?

That, of course is at the core of this discussion, one group of true believers insisting that ONLY their belief can be true and that others must also believe. Even that other's children must be taught something about their religion.

There are only so many hours and teachers can't even get most kids literate by grade 12. They already can't read or write cursive so I have to hand print messages to my youngest worker.

So should people really take more time to teach one religion or should some perhaps learn a bit of science? I notice that the people who prefer religion over science always seem to go to doctors, drive cars, carry cell phones, live in places with heat, keep food in refrigerators, use canned food, and even fly to vacation spots, all of which required science but no religion.

If, after getting most of the kids able to read, there is spare time, why not squeeze a bit of science or even logic into their minds and leave the religion for churches.

I never insist that churches teach computer science.

Why should schools teach any religion, let alone one exclusive religion only supported by about 35% of the U.S. population.

The more extreme religious leaders are rapidly losing customers they can boss around and get money from, that is why they are fighting so hard to force their religion onto kids. Fortunately that won't work unless you start indoctrinating them very young, even pre school. By the time kids realize all adults are idiots (about age 10 for the smarter ones) they can't be forced to believe anything.

Ever talked to a kid? Or tried to teach one anything, like not to speed in a 3000 lb machine?

Exposing them to the KJB in tenth grade would likely make them reject all religion.

I just post this to help give others some encouragement and ammunition they can use in discussions, certainly the ones who insist only they are right won't benefit from reading any of my posts.

Try to be good to people.

If you can't do that, at least try to think.

Daryle Jean Garia

No, the Bible should be banned.

Jerry M Choat

The Bible most definitely should not be banned in our schools it should be part of the library.

The Bible is a command by our heavenly Father where he says;

Keep this Book of the Law always on your lips; meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do everything written in it. Then you will be prosperous and successful.

The important thing is to buy out time from less important things for daily meditation on God’s Word Read {Ephesians. 5:15, 16

Our children could read it while their in library at School

God’s Word repeatedly promises blessings to all who meditate on it and who strive to apply what they learn.

Victor Allen Hawthorne

There are 66 books in the KJV Bible. Which of the books should be eliminated? Please be specific so we can understand the books you are referring to. I assure you God finds immorality an abomination.

John A Mullen

YOU, cant take GOD out of our country, schools or hearts!

Frederick Goslin

I don't believe that any religious txt should be banned. They should be there for any that want or need to read or consult them

Sterley P. Palmer

If you ban the bible, you ban freedom of religion.if you ban any book of any religion, you ban the freedom to worship given to us by the constitution of this country.

Brother, Rob

If one religion is taken away, then all religions should be taken away from the schools, but it doesn't mean that it is a right thing to do. But it is a equal right for every religious to have a belief in school,