
Should Muslim communities be encouraged in America? That's the question at the heart of a debate roiling Texas.
Governor Greg Abbott is among the opponents of a planned Islamic community just outside of Dallas, and his heated rhetoric is a sign of the tensions at play; Abbot has insinuated the development would be governed by "Sharia Law" and has directed numerous state agencies to investigate the community planners for unspecified criminal activity.
Texas lawmakers are also warning the developers of the proposed 400-acre Islamic community not to build – lest they face hazy and unclear legal consequences.
What is EPIC City?
The East Plano Islamic Center, or EPIC City, is a planned development near Josephine, Texas, situated some 40 miles northeast of Dallas. Designed with Texas’ growing Islamic community in mind, EPIC City’s plans include a mosque, 1,000 homes, a private Islamic school, public parks, a community college, and numerous commercial developments one would find in similarly-sized communities across the country.
A video posted by the developer gives an overview of the project:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, however, is clearly not happy about this plan. He is accusing the developer of criminal activity, and recently ordered a dozen state agencies, including the Texas Rangers, to investigate the group.
The charges?
Sharia Law?
“All entities in Texas must follow state law, not Sharia law," Governor Abbott wrote on X, accusing the group of attempting to implement Sharia law in their as-of-yet unbuilt community. Abbott was responding to a post accusing Sharia law of being based in “pedophilia, total oppression of women, honor killings, [and] forced compliance.”
Abbott also shared his concern that EPIC City would be an illegal “no-go zone,” where non-Muslims are not able to enter.
However, EPIC City’s website says it is “dedicated to creating a space where everyone feels welcome, safe, and empowered to grow,” and offers no indication they plan to ignore the laws of the United States in the community.
"People of every background, faith, and culture" who "align with our goals of safety and security" are welcome in the community, according to its website.
The Community Responds
Many local residents shared Abbott’s concern at a recent hearing held at the Collin County Courthouse, though some expressed hesitation to voice their disapproval of EPIC out of fear of being labeled “racist.” One resident, Sasha Scoto, accused the Islamic community of being against “inclusion.”
“Why else would they want their own community?” she wondered. “What is the purpose of them having their own community?”
Others argued that the planned primarily-Islamic community defies Christianity. As one woman from Denton County put it, “we’re very compassionate people and we’re very kind, but at some point, we gotta draw the line and say, ‘This nation and this state was built and founded on the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and there is only one God and one Father in this country.”
A local pastor echoed that sentiment while speaking to county officials:
And others simply had more practical concerns. One Josephine resident said the proposed community loudspeakers, which will call residents to pray five times a day, would disturb the peace.
Still, EPIC City did find some support in the community. “It’s disappointing that these so-called Christians with American values are so quick to abandon those values and the Constitution,” argued one resident, Darryl Evans. “My hope is that this commission will remember that they represent all residents, not just folks with ‘Christo-fascist’ ideologies.”
What do you think of EPIC City? Do you see any issues with the planned Islamic community? And are concerns over legal violations and Sharia law based in reality, or is this an example of bigotry toward a minority faith?
92 comments
-
I believe there is only one God, one Divine, that all people worship. Different Religions have different names, i.e. God and Buddah, and have different ways to worship. I have to admit, I had to look up Sharia Law. What I found was that means following the Right Path, moral path, that includes prayer, fasting and donations to the poor. I find nothing here to be afraid of, but to appreciate. What I'm hearing, and reading, is some "Traditional Christians" are afraid the Muslim Cities will "lock non-Muslims out". Kinda like these "Christians" lock anyone else out that doesn't believe exactly as they do, to the point of enactling unjust laws to make women follow their beliefs. The only way they can gather the public support is to assign "violence and crime" to the Muslims and their Cities. Newsflash! There is cime and criminals in all religions. These criminals take on all shapes and form of crime. Seems to me there is some hypocricy and projection on Gov Abbott's reaction (not response!). As a Unitarian Universalist, I believe in all people and all religions to worship the Faith. I also believe we can learn from these other people and other Faith. After all, we all worship the same Divine!!! If we had more people in this country look at the World, and it's people, in this way maybe, just maybe, we would have a more peaceful world. At the very least, a more peaceful country, USA.
-
America has its own laws... and as for the Muslim community, it just divides us more because we are supposed to be an integrated society, not a country of separated religious, racial, and ideological communities.
-
Islam is not only a religion, it is also a legal and political system. So long as they continue to obey the laws of the US and the State of Texas as far as I am concerned, they are welcome to congregate and worship as they choose.
Sadly though, there is a history of such communities where, once established, the zealots amongst them tend to seek to expand the influence of Islam. For example, there are areas in UK cities where groups of what can only be described as 'religious thugs', harass and sometimes assault women they consider are not sufficiently modestly dressed. Unfortunately, officials in the UK do not seem to have the backbone to arrest and prosecute these criminals for their illegal activities. Though there is no mention of it at present, the evidence of other similar communities, particularly in the UK, would tend to suggest that over time there may be attempts to impose their own community standards on others.
However, innocent until proven guilty. I say let them go ahead and in future if they attempt to enforce Sharia law or 'no-go' areas, then move to prosecute those responsible.
-
Ignorance of Islam is causing massive problems in the world. People are taking the actions of a few radicalists and make them the beliefs of the mainstream. Nothing could be further from the truth, unless you believe that Christianity is a religion of hate-mongers and racists because the Ku Klux Klan demand they are Christian.
-
You know, it's pretty telling how much absolute HATE and bigotry is being spread in the comments. Not to mention a ton of outright lies and misinformation that is being pushed to try to justify the hatred.
It's sad.
If the town in question were a Christian or Catholic based, they'd not say a word. Even if it were Orthodox hardliners who wished to "iron fist" it. Same if it were a Jewish community.
But because it's Islamic, the absolute hatred and bigotry is being screamed from the rooftops.
Of course they'd be screaming the same hatred, and spewing the same, frankly disgusting, lies if it were a Buddhist community or a Pagan town being built, too. For some, maybe not as hardcore, but bad enough.
They have the same mentalities as the people who organized, and participated in the 1921 destruction of Black Wall Street, also known as the Tulsa race massacre. They're the same mindsets that committed the 1920's Ocoee and Rosewood Massacres. If you don't know what those are, look them up.
And the SAME horrific lies were spewed about people in those areas that are being spewed, now, about a Muslim-based township being built. And, if the Texas governor and the people I see here have their way, they'll likely commit the same crimes against the peaceful civilians trying to live in that town, that the ones that attacked Tulsa, Ocoee, and Rosewood townships did.
-
The Xtians are making efforts to have a xtian version of the nonsense.
-
The kind and caring of Islam and Muslims is a total sham. Islam and Muslims hate Westerners, yet they want to come here and then turn America (countries are the people not the land) into another Mid-Eastern pos country. If we keep allowing illegals to come into America and the open to other unchecked, unlimited number of other foreigners, America is less than 50 years from a complete take offer. Just look at history to see how the land was taken from the Native Americans. Now instead of Europeans taking over from the Indians, it’s Hispanics, Middle Eastern Muslims, India Indians, and African Muslims, ie, Somalians are slowly pushing the Europeans out. It’s only a matter of time until America (the people, not the land) will cease to exist. We need to take America back before it’s too late. Stopping this city from being built is just one way toward doing that. If the Muslim want a Muslim community, let them return to their home countries for that. May our true God bless America.
-
Take America back from who? You know that the USA is a Multi-Ethnic, Multi-RELIGION nation with the 1st Amendment SPECIFICALLY SAYING that no one can be banned from worshipping whatever religion they want, or being forced to worship any religious if they so choose.
This community WILL be built because the FIRST AMENDMENT allows them to. No, Europeans are not being "forced out". And there are a little over 3 million US CITIZENS who are practicing Muslims and follow the Islamic Faith. They are not "illegal" simply due to their religion.
Though your post, dripping with hatred, is telling. You should read "Sermon on the Mount" Bigotry and Hatred is specifically called out as "Evil". And you're showing this in spades.
-
-
The United States Constitution calls for separation of church and state. We are neither a Christian, Muslim, Buddhism or any other religion nation. I fully support everyone's right to practice their own religion except in cases when it steps on the individual rights of others. Sharia and or Christian law is not part of our Constitution.
-
If they were proposing a purely CHRISTIAN city, where people were called to pray every sunday and wednesday, and they had Christian cathedrals, and so forth, Abbot and the rest would be partying. But because it's Islamic it's "evil?"
1st amendment means FREEDOM OF RELIGION. That includes ALL Religions, not just the one Abbot and his cohorts claim to follow.
I see nothing wrong with having this Islamic community. As long as they are there in peace there is no harm there.
-
Please correct me... is it freedom of religion, or freedom from religion??
-
The exact wording of the constitution is the following:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This means the government can't restrict practice of religion personally (except where it tries to force it on another person) or prohibiting communities based on religion if they want to form. 14th amendment extended this limitation to the states as shown in Constitutional law cases before supreme court since that time. This means the governor is just posturing since he can't stop them (unless they do try to engage in some of the middle eastern barbarism).
So it is Freedom of Religion for each person. That said, your freedom of religion ends where my skin starts.
-
-
-
Governor Abbot continues in his efforts to become a lower form of life after he passes to the next....
"To be clear, Sharia law is not allowed in Texas."
No one is talking about Sharia becoming the law. If Muslims who follow Sharia wanted to follow Sharia, they would not be in the USA.
"Nor are Sharia cities."
What the heck is a "Sharia" city?
No one said anything about a "city," people sometimes just a neighborhood where they can live and build their families' lives where they feel comfortable, able to be themselves, live in accordance with their own beliefs: maybe have housing within walking distance of a place of worship, schools they need or markets that carry items needed by the observant, or non observant such as certified Halal meat, etc. Or for that matter a Hershey bar.
Goodness knows no one is questioning similar "christian" enclaves (reference my previous re: AZ PUBLIC school district catering to Church of LDS).
"Nor are “no go zones“ which this project seems to imply."
The ONLY "no go zones" are in Texas are where Gov. Abbot has continued to pervert the US Constitution, oppress minorities of all kinds, separate immigrant children from parents (for what PERPoses?) and send adult immigrants by bus and plane to states he is trying to undermine ... and he is so nuts he doesn't even have a role in the new T'Rump administration...
"The project as proposed in the video is not allowed in Texas."
I would like to see the video in which Mr. Abbot appeared as a "Texan." I suspect it was the one where the actor was credited as "A-Butt." And there are only two uses for one of those that I am aware of... 3 if I include a colonoscopy.
If you want to build a neighborhood of your own, where you have what you need, and can live and raise your families with support... as long as we are all part of one great fabric and allow one another the rights and expressions inherent in community: diversity, equity,and inclusiveness... I am happy to visit my friends, buy my herbs and spices and other needs there... for Pete's sake what is the problem with these old slave states? Because that is where the real problem continues to be.
I bid you peace. Reb tk
-
“No one is talking about Sharia becoming the law. If Muslims who follow Sharia wanted to follow Sharia, they would not be in the USA.”
Sadly you are mistaken. Sharia Law is already being tested in American courts of Law. So don’t tell us this lie please. You can start by searching the first Sharia Law case in the NJ courts. Lord help us if our courts ever allow this.
-
Just what do believe Muslims will be teaching in Muslims schools? Do you honestly believe they will follow Texas State school curriculum?
-
Do Christian / Catholic schools, or Jewish Private schools? Or Bhuddist temples where some students study? Do they? Hate to break your bubble but RELIGIOUS schools don't have to follow state curriculum if they are not state-funded.
-
-
Just what do believe Muslims will be teaching in Muslims schools? Do you honestly believe they will follow Texas State school curriculum?
And children are removed every day when American parents commit a crime and are sent to jail. So why are you defending children being removed from illegal criminals in America? Do you believe they are better than American criminals?
-
"And children are removed every day when American parents commit a crime and are sent to jail. So why are you defending children being removed from illegal criminals in America? Do you believe they are better than American criminals?"
What "Illegal Criminals" in America are you talking of? Your BS attempt to try to claim people who are American Citizens and practice the Islamic Faith are, somehow "illegals and criminals" is as blatant as your bigotry is.
-
-
-
What a freaking racist. He is the one that puts forth that they'd be ruled by Sharia law. He hates Muslims so much that you can feel it dripping off his words even in text. Calling them pedophiles, seriously? They're Americans, they are used to and clearly prefer American laws or they would live somewhere else, and they've outright said they don't intend to do anything that's against American law.
They didn't even say anything about Sharia Law, Abbot is the one that said that. Given that their mission statement says that "'People of every background, faith, and culture' who 'align with our goals of safety and security' are welcome in the community, according to its website," they are clearly NOT planning to implement Sharia law. So Abbot is pulling this right out of his nasty imagination, and now harassing them with legal investigation based on accusations of things he made up and the only reason he would think that is because he hates Muslims. Who does he think he is? He's behind the bill to ban transition for adult transgender people, too. Clearly he thinks that his position gives him the right to run roughshod over anyone he doesn't personally agree with. He's a bully.
-
Religion is not a race, sorry. Try playing a different card!!!
-
Racist can also apply to Religious Bigots. And Ari is 100% correct.
-
Bigotry is disgusting no matter which way you look at it. Racism is bigotry based on perceived race though we all bleed red.
Bigotry on religion is just as bad whether Christians on islamics and jews, islamics on christians and jews, or any other combination. Building a community of like minded where they want mostly neighbors of same religion to cut down on bigoted attacks from neighbors is their right if they want to pay for it. The governor was just being a bigot and accusing them of doing something in rhetoric that he has no idea whether they want it or not. he is playing to the cameras, masses and trying to stir up fever to appeal to his support base.
-
-
-
They want to build a community and are willing to pay for it. Go for it and stimulate the economy. No religious government interference in that.
They want to impose Sharia law, any parts compatible with Texas and Federal law is good, anything that goes against Texas and federal law can get them arrested. They have the same rights of privacy of their land under due process (search warrents and writs to free people override that privacy)
They can not force anyone living there to follow any laws.
-
Here's the thing, they DON'T want to impose Sharia Law. He**, the only ones trying to impose anything close to it are the Christians / Catholics here in the USA.
-
The Muslim men rule and force the woman to obey them or face the wrath, including beating, being burnt, cut and other forms of physical and mental abuse. And yes, they do want Sharia Law, that’s why it’s already being tested in American courts of law. You are sadly mistaken.
-
-
Do you know what ‘align with our safety and security’ even means? I’m certain you have never listened to a 8 yr old young Muslim girl scream to the point of passing out from the pain a Muslim man cutting out their clitoris with a broken bottle. And I most certainly you have never spent any time in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Iran or any other Muslim nation in the Middle East because of you had, you would not be posting this nonsense.
-
I doubt you have ever spent any time in any Muslim nation either. My SISTER, however, has. As she was in Desert Storm, deployed twice.
And having a Muslim town does NOT, in any way, compromise our nation's safety and security in any way. And, btw, CHRISITAN men do just as bad here in the United States. I worked with at-risk teens from highly religious Christian communities back in my 20's. And there are a sh. ton of horror stories I could tell you.
Oh, btw? Most of that "clit cutting"? Is done by CHRISITAN AND CATHOLIC ORTHODOX GROUPS. And is primarily found in the African regions. They call it "Female Circumcision" and they use razors, not "broken bottles". While it does happen in the Middle East, that is not as common in those areas.
So your hate-filled Rhetoric is over 90% lies.
Hate to tell ya kiddo, but no they don't. Not here in the United States. Do extremists act that way in Afghanistan, and other nations of the Middle East? Yes.
It's not being "tested in american courts" by anyone except the Catholics and Christians, or rather the ones that CALL themselves such, that are currently attempting to run our nation with an iron fist.
And, btw, I am a woman. I was also born, and raised, Roman Catholic before I broke away from the church. I also know hundreds of Muslim men and women. Kinda happens when you work with several international groups.
Simply put, no Muslim individuals in the USA are trying to enforce "Shariah Law" here. The only ones trying to beat, rpe, cut, torture, and KILL women here in the United States are the same ones screaming foul about a Muslim based township being established.
And, btw, 1st amendment states that these individuals have the 100% right to build their town as they see fit. It's their property, and they can worship as they like as long as they are not harming others. And they are not.
-
The moment they try any of those brutal tricks you are talking about, they get to go to jail for child abuse, assault and so on.
They want to pray 5 times a day, they want to give alms, they want to make a pilgrimage to mecca once in their life, they want to keep and eat Halal foods, they want to keep head covered and dress modest (as long as it is their choice). They want to respect the people of the book. I am all for it.
Islam has a tradition in the 900's and 1000's of actually being good enlightened rules that were accept to a great extent (in spain and north africa). So much so that many of the great works of judiasm were in islamic control areas in that time. That has changed over the centuries and become extremist in many cases but the extremists get the attention, not all the more peaceful muslims of which there are millions in US.
The moment they start violence, abuse and hostilities, then the laws of the country will kick in and they face all the penalties. The moment they try to force their rules on others, they face price of law but as long as it is voluntary, I have no objection to community of like minded living together.
-
One more thing for consideration: there are about 4.5 million muslims in the US. only a few hundred are so extreme that they hit headlines and newspapers for it.
-
-
-
Let Texas deal with it. It is not our place to start playing in goverment. Remember seperation of chirch and state.
-
As if Abbot, Patrick and Paxton have not imposed their own "Christian" version of sharia law! If those gents had their way only certain Christian denominations would be allowed to openly practice their faith in Texas.
-
I really enjoy the comments! I have my own opinions and beliefs, but the comments are always a highlight. I actually learn something every time I read.
-
I lived in Muslim Southeast Asia for years. .No Sharia Law. Came home unharmed and still 'Christian. L ove the people . No prob with Asian origins. Civil law rules those nations many Ethnicities and religions. It works.
-
-
You cannot have a Muslim city without Muslim Law. That law is called Sharia and is based on the Sunnah, the Quran, and the Ijma.
-
Hey, what happened to that “religious freedom” stuff Republicans are always pushing? It’s almost like it was never anything but a cynical ploy to gain political advantage, huh?
-
Religious freedom allows anyone to freely worship as they please. Building cities based on Religion within the country and creating laws based on that religion should never be allowed anywhere in the United States of America. That is why we became a melting pot. Everyone immigrating here and become citizens, one Nation Under God, not every religion under each religion. Read a translated version of the Koran and you will see it is a playback to destroy Christians in the name of Allah and kill those that don't convert to Islam. Don't be fooled, this is not political gain. This is very dangerous territory and goes against everything this country was founded on. Live and let live, but beware of wolves in sheep's. Clothing.
-
Ask the people in the Detroit area how well the communities up there are doing?
-
Detroit is primarily Christian / Catholic. Though its downfall was due to economics rather than religion. And, btw, the communities there are doing fine.
-
-
-
-
Shitria law does not belong in the US. If they want to live under that, go back to the country they came from that has that law.
-
They don't. They didn't say that at all. Greg Abbott made it up. They're American Muslims, they want to live under American law like normal people.
-
Do you have the same opinion of the Hassidic enclaves in New York and New Jersey, where they practice a form of Judaism that is alien to not only Christians but to 90+% of the Jewish Population in that part of the country? What about in the parts of the country where Mormons practices are inimical to that of the accepted practices of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints? Do none of those have a place in the United States?
-
What practices are there among the Hassidic and the Mormons that conflict with US or State Law?
-
Pedophilia and Polygamy with the mormons and the Hasidic marriages are not valid in US
-
-
-
-
Would Abbott also object to a "Chinatown" in Houston or Dallas? They do exist. Probably in Austin as well. Furthermore, very few of their families have anyone who is fluent in English. For the People of Plano, that are "afraid" of the bullhorns announcing prayer and the religious rites that include family structure, how is that different than the local Catholic Church ringing it's churchbells to announce a service? What about the requirement that a divorced person have their first marriage annulled before they are allowed to remarry? Also, would you rather they scatter to the winds and wind up buying a house and becoming your neighbor? Every city has pockets of ethnic groups. They have a place where they can be neighbors without judgement for being who they are. They can celebrate their faith as a community without having to explain to their neighbors why they are fasting and wearing different clothing during Ramadan and stopping to pray at prescribed times of the day.
-
What practices in the "Chinatowns" of Houston and Dallas conflict with State and Federal Law? The "Chinatown" that you speak of is still subject to our laws and Police presence. Sharia Law excludes State and Federal Authority and attempts to establish a Jurisdictional No-Go Zone. Chinatown does not.
-
James,
The only one suggesting that this area would establish Sharia Law is Gov. Greg Abbott. The developers are not suggesting it, only wanting a place where their people can live together in community with places nearby they can worship and shop in accordance with their religious traditions (food and dress laws). This would be no different than a Jewish community wanting to establish a neighborhood with a synagogue, kosher grocery stores, and clothing stores that provide clothing in accordance with thier religious practices regarding fibers, prayer shawls and yarmulkes, etc. I didn't see any request for exemptions from laws or special police enforcement requests.
-
-
What practices in the "Chinatowns" of Houston and Dallas conflict with State and Federal Law? The "Chinatown" that you speak of is still subject to our laws and Police presence. Sharia Law excludes State and Federal Authority and attempts to establish a Jurisdictional No-Go Zone. Chinatown does not.
-
Since I already responded to your first of these, but see you are fixated on what other ethnic communities do in conflict with State and Federal Law, so I'll continue my comments. Nothing. That's the whole point. Except they have traditions that possibly relate to their hiring practices within the communities that could arguably be considered discriminatory. Yet, is requiring someone to be fluent in Spanish for a store that serves primarily Spanish speaking people considered discrimination, or practical? Is not allowing a wife to work illegal? You can interchange other languages and ethnicities for Spanish-Speaking in my examples.
-
-
-
True Shari’ah Law is not only a good thing, but by definition, The Constitution of The United States is completely Shari’ah Law. The word Shari’ah comes from the root sheen-ra-ayn or shara’a. This word literally means to freely hydrate your beasts of burden such as oxen, horses, camels, etc. by releasing them to an oasis full of clean and refreshing water. They rehydrate by drinking the water or soaking in it, however the creature desires, without restraints of any kind. In the spiritual application, the noun of the root, shari’ah, means to rehydrate spiritually without restraints like organized religion. There are no real clergies in Islam, just elected leaders. The false use of the word Shari’ah involves “sects” of Islam such as Sunni, Shi’a, and all the other 79 or so sects of Islam of which the Qur’an forbids. True Shari’ah Law then refers to laws that liberate people spiritually and in many other ways like The Constitution of the United States as I mentioned, employees washing their hands before touching food, not robbing banks, eating healthy foods, obeying the Ten Commandments, loving and helping your neighbors, tutoring students who have jihad in various subjects such as arithmetic, etc. These and much, much more is what Shari’ah Law truly means, and it is intended to help people be healthy and liberated physically, socially, morally, financially, and in every aspect of life. It is not intended for shoving religion or politics down anyone’s throats as we find in all forms of “sectarian” (false) Islam.
Therefore, I think to forbid an Islamic community from existing due to Shari’ah Law is ignorant, but, just as much as any Christian or other community, a preliminary investigation is always in order. In fact, when a community of any kind is proposed, isn’t it normal to investigate the merits first? For example, who will be involved in establishing such a community? What are the mission statement and bylaws of the community? What is the ultimate goals, objectives, and purpose of the community? and so forth. But to simply shut down a community out of ignorance is wrong.
As for Shari’ah Law, how does this community define it and what are extreme examples of it that threaten the peace and security of its members and members of surrounding communities? Is it true Shari’ah Law or an extremist, militant cult? These are the things that need to be considered; otherwise, discrimination against an Islamic community because they are “different” is Constitutionally a violation.
-
All religion must follow laws of the land, freedom of religion does not mean freedom to do whatever you want. No religion on earth can prove or disprove that they are the one religion, we all must respect each other's spiritual beliefs (not physical beliefs), not in the false laws that are imbedded within all religions, the good in religion and the bad was imbedded to test humanities free will, which means that we as humans have the ability to choose between right and wrong
-
Gov. Abbott opposes Epic City because the ones who want to build it are not "White" but he won't use the language that was once upon a time used openly in Texas concerning those people because he would be banned from X. Or would he? Amen?
-
Does Governor Abbott oppose Sharia Law? If he does then he also opposes The Ten Commandments. God gave the Ten Commandments to Moses. Later on in time God gave The Sharia to The Angel Gabriel who gave it to Muhammad. So if Abbott denies the validity of The Sharia then he denies the validity of the The Ten Commandments and The Validity of The One who sent both. And because Jesus had said long ago, "I did not come to do away with The Law." (Matthew 5:17) then Abbot in seeking to do away with The Sharia seeks to crucify Jesus all over again. So when Abbott eventually dies ("All born will taste death." - Quran 3:185) in his sin of denial of The Sharia, The Ten Commandments, God, and Jesus, and goes to Hell (Allah Willing) he will get instruction in matters legal and not so legal from Satan himself - who knows the law and The Law better than most of the lawyers on Earth today. Amen?
-
Not so Michael
This is more about the misalignment of Islamic law and USA law. The two can not coexist.
There are several freedoms we afford to all people that Islamic law denies to certain people. Furthermore, Islamic law seeks out punishment against certain people USA law seeks to protect and guarantee equality. Simply put, Islamic law is one of oppression while USA las is one of liberation.
Even the ten commandments contain law that is in opposition to USA law, namely those commandments requiring the worship of God. USA law guarantees any given citizen the right to worship anything they please or nothing at all.
It should be noted that if one believes the bible, he can not believe the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Jehovah's Witness bible or any other "updated message from God". The inverse is also true. All of those religions must discount the accuracy and legitimacy of the bible.
-
ServantofJudgement: Quite a bit of misinformation in your post. True Shari’ah Law and laws of the USA are very compatible. In fact, The Constitution of The United States is Shari’ah compliant from beginning to end. However, Islamic law as prescribed by Muslims who misinterpret Shari’ah Law due to their use of ahadith is not by definition true Shari’ah Law which is why Shari’ah Law is confoundingly different from one sect of Islam to another.
I will give you this. You are correct when you say, “that if one believes the bible, he can not believe the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Jehovah's Witness bible or any other "updated message from God.” On that note, however, you’re taking the Deuteronomy and Revelations passages out of context. Those passages refer to the books they were written in.
I could say much more, but I’m crunching the midnight oil. If you want to know more about True Shari’ah Law, visit an Ahmadiyya mosque. Their “movement” teaches the Qur’an in context, not pseudo Islamic Law. They are not a sect in Islam but a unifying movement of Islam.
-
All I have to say to you is what The Quran says about YOU: "Kill Infidelity wherever you find it." (Quran 2:191) But I don't want to kill you. That would be for good for you. You would not be dying in your disbelief and sin but instead at the hand of a Willing Muslim. I want to go HIGHER. I want to see you die in your sin and disbelief and go to Hell where Satan will ram The Quran down your throat (Allah Willing). My damnation is that I waste my time talking to Infidel Disbelievers such as yourself. You just might listen to me and Believe and avoid Hell. But whatever I do or not do (Allah Willing): "I will fill Hell with jinn and humans all - a multitude from every community." (Quran 32:13) More than anything I want to see (Allah Willing) you earn your Hole In Hell and get it (Allah Willing). Amen.
-
-
-
AMEN WILBERTA, THESE FELONs ALL ARE GETTING AWAY WITH TOO, TOO MUCH CRIME in ANY NAME or MANNER THEY CITE CIVIL WAR WEII BRING IT ON " MAGA MAGGETS " YOU THINK TURD tRUMP WILL BE LEADING THE CHARGE GET REAL, YOU ALREADY GOT SCREWED and HE WILL CONTINUE, NOBODY WINS WITH FELONS in THE W H, NOBODY !
-
Gosh John.
Why do liberals always resort to violence and threats of violence? Like clockwork they'll cry havoc, encourage violence and close their eyes to anything nasty they do. You say you don't like crime, like you just said then say 20 million alien criminals are welcome in a nation of laws.
I've got mighty sore news for you. When liberals revolt they burn their own city down and kill their own neighbors with piles of pre stacked bricks. When conservatives revolt, nations are formed, borders get redrawn and declarations of independence are issued.
Always violence and venom from the loving and inclusive left.
-
When maga revolts they beat law enforcement and defecate in the Capitol building. There are violent people of every persuasion. Whenever I read your comments I wonder why you are so angry. Trolling a community of religious, thoughtful people is odd. For what purpose?
-
-
Get a life John!!!
-
-
The U.S. legal system is built on individual rights, equality under the law, and separation of church and state—principles that clash with Sharia’s religious foundation and, in some cases, its unequal treatment of genders or non-Muslims. For instance, Sharia’s family law often gives men unilateral divorce rights or custody preferences, which wouldn’t fly under U.S. equal protection standards. Hudud punishments? They’d violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment faster than you can say "ACLU lawsuit." Practically, it’s a moot point. Muslims are about 1% of the U.S. population—roughly 3.5 million—and there’s no evidence of a serious movement to impose Sharia nationally. Claims otherwise tend to come from fear mongering corners, not data.
-
Greg Abbott is the fear monger here. He is the only one talking about Sharia law, the community has no such plans.
-
Visit Slough England or Dearborn Michigan. We'll talk.
-
Comparing the U.S. Constitution and Sharia Law are built on different foundations—one prioritizes individual rights and democratic rule, the other divine guidance and communal obligations.
Source of Authority
U.S. Constitution: Derives legitimacy from "We the People," a human-made compact ratified in 1788. It’s secular, with no appeal to divine will, though influenced by Enlightenment ideas and some Judeo-Christian ethics.
Sharia Law: Rooted in divine revelation—the Quran (God’s word) and Hadith (Prophet Muhammad’s sayings). It’s interpreted by scholars (ulama) through fiqh (jurisprudence), not elected reps. God’s sovereignty trumps human consensus.
Purpose
U.S. Constitution: Aims to "secure the Blessings of Liberty" and establish a government balancing power among branches. It’s about structure—checks, balances, and rights—not morality or salvation.
Sharia Law: Seeks to align human behavior with God’s will, covering worship, ethics, family, and justice. It’s holistic, guiding both personal and public life toward spiritual and social harmony.
Rights and Freedoms
U.S. Constitution: Guarantees individual liberties via the Bill of Rights—free speech, religion, press, assembly (First Amendment), plus due process and equal protection (Fifth, Fourteenth). Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Sharia Law: Rights come from God, not nature or citizenship. Freedom exists but within Islamic bounds—speech can’t blaspheme, and religious liberty doesn’t extend to leaving Islam in strict interpretations. Equality favors Muslims over non-Muslims and men over women in some rulings (e.g., inheritance, testimony).
Lawmaking
U.S. Constitution: Laws are crafted by elected legislatures, checked by courts, and amendable by a supermajority. It’s flexible, secular, and responsive to human input.
Sharia Law: Core laws are fixed in divine texts, immutable by human vote. Scholars adapt them via ijtihad (reasoning), but only within Islamic principles. No separation of church and state—religion is the state’s backbone.
Justice System
U.S. Constitution: Criminal justice rests on adversarial trials, juries, and presumption of innocence. Punishments aim at deterrence or rehabilitation, not divine retribution—cruel and unusual penalties are banned (Eighth Amendment).
Sharia Law: Features hudud (fixed punishments) like amputation or stoning, qisas (retaliation), and ta’zir (discretionary penalties). Justice serves both earthly order and divine approval. No juries—judges (qadis) rule based on Islamic evidence rules.
Equality
U.S. Constitution: Pushes toward legal equality (Fourteenth Amendment), though imperfectly applied historically. Race, gender, and religion don’t dictate rights in theory.
Sharia Law: Equality is tiered—Muslims over non-Muslims, men over women in certain contexts (e.g., a woman’s testimony may count half a man’s in financial cases, per Quran 2:282). Non-Muslims (dhimmis) pay jizya tax and face restrictions in some systems.
Religion and State
U.S. Constitution: Separates church and state (First Amendment). No religion gets official status, though debates rage over how "secular" it really is.
Sharia Law: Fuses religion and governance. The state enforces Islamic norms, from prayer to morality laws. Secularism is alien to traditional Sharia frameworks.
Flexibility
U.S. Constitution: Built to evolve—27 amendments so far, plus judicial reinterpretation (e.g., Brown v. Board). It’s a living document.
Sharia Law: Core tenets are eternal, but application varies. Some schools (e.g., Hanafi) allow more flexibility than others (e.g., Hanbali). Modernist Muslims push reform, but traditionalists resist.
Practical Clash Points
Free Speech: The Constitution protects blasphemy; Sharia often punishes it.
Punishment: Sharia’s hudud (e.g., flogging) would violate the Eighth Amendment.
Religious Freedom: Sharia’s apostasy laws contradict the First Amendment.
Gender: Constitutional equal protection chafes against Sharia’s gendered rules.
Overlaps Both value justice, order, and some form of moral compass—Sharia explicitly, the Constitution implicitly (e.g., "general Welfare"). Both can coexist in private spheres (Muslims in the U.S. follow Sharia family law voluntarily), but as public systems, they’re oil and water. The Constitution’s secular, human-centric design fundamentally rejects Sharia’s theocratic core. That said, Sharia’s real-world impact depends on interpretation—Saudi Arabia’s version differs from Indonesia’s, while the Constitution’s consistency hinges on courts and culture.
-
-
You really should research the tenants of the Islamic faith.
-
Sharia Law, derived from the Quran and Hadith, governs many aspects of Muslim life, including personal conduct, family matters, and criminal justice. Some of its tenets clash with Christian values or Western norms, often sparking debate. Here’s a rundown of the ones most Christians might find objectionable, based on theological and cultural differences: Punishments (Hudud): Sharia prescribes severe penalties like amputation for theft, flogging for adultery, or execution for apostasy. Christians, especially those leaning on New Testament teachings of forgiveness and mercy (e.g., "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - John 8:7), often see these as harsh or incompatible with grace-focused doctrine.
Apostasy Laws: Leaving Islam can carry a death penalty under some interpretations of Sharia. Christianity, while historically not immune to punishing heresy, generally emphasizes personal choice in faith today, making this a sticking point—especially for evangelicals who value conversion.
Polygamy: Sharia allows a man to marry up to four wives, provided he treats them equally (Quran 4:3). Most Christian traditions, rooted in monogamy (e.g., "a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife" - Matthew 19:5), reject this outright.
Divorce Rules: In Sharia, a husband can divorce his wife unilaterally via talaq (repudiation), while a wife’s path to divorce is narrower, often requiring judicial approval. Christians, particularly in denominations stressing marriage as a sacrament, may view this as unequal or dismissive of mutual consent.
Gender Roles: Sharia often assigns distinct roles—men as providers, women as homemakers—with rules like inheritance favoring males (Quran 4:11) or requiring female modesty (e.g., hijab). Some Christians, especially progressive ones, balk at what they see as rigid patriarchy, though traditionalists might not mind as much.
Blasphemy Laws: Insulting Islam or the Prophet Muhammad can be a capital offense under Sharia. Christians, while respecting their own prohibitions on blasphemy, often lean toward free speech in modern contexts, seeing such laws as stifling religious dialogue.
Jihad: Though often misunderstood, Sharia’s concept of jihad includes armed struggle in defense of Islam under certain conditions. Christians with pacifist leanings (e.g., Quakers) or those wary of religious wars find this militaristic streak troubling, despite their own history with crusades.
These objections aren’t universal—some conservative Christians might share Sharia’s emphasis on moral order or traditional roles—but the sticking points usually boil down to differences in grace vs. law, individual liberty vs. communal duty, and how justice gets meted out. Context matters too: Sharia’s application varies wildly across Muslim-majority countries, from secular-ish Turkey to hardline Saudi Arabia.
-
-
-
The protection of children from pedophiles supercedes religions. No children under the age of 18 should be violated by an adult over 21 is line that should not be crossed. Abuse of a woman by any man physically or mentally cannot be tolerated in a Civil Society whether married or not this must remain against the law in America.
-
Straight up right on Edward.
The finer creation ought to be treated as such. Islamic states put gals in the ground when they talk too loudly about women's rights.
-
All very true. Which is why this particular community should not be a problem. They have no plans to deviate from American law in any way, since they're Americans.
-
-
I see no problem with a Muslim centered community. No different than Jewish neighborhoods or communities. No different than any faith community. People tend to congregate together in groups of like minds. As long as they keep our laws and allow other religions to enter the area what is the problem? I'd enjoy shopping in a Muslim area. Peace to them. And yes I am Christian.
-
All entities in America must follow state and federal Constitutional laws. And frankly, I can't find too much difference between Sharia Law and Maga Christian Laws as this dangerous felon lead Republican party is applying it.
-
Your not being very frank wilberta.
If you're really being frank, let me help point out a few differences between sharia law and maga Christian laws.
There are no maga Christian laws.
With sharia law comes:
Religious Freedom – Non-Muslims may face restrictions on religious expression, conversion, or public worship.
Blasphemy & Apostasy Laws – Criticism of Islam or leaving the faith can be punishable by severe penalties, including death in some interpretations.
Legal Inequality – Different legal standards may apply to Muslims and non-Muslims in matters like inheritance, testimony, and taxation (e.g., jizya tax).
Women's Rights – Gender-based laws can limit women's autonomy in areas like testimony in court, dress codes, and inheritance rights.
Freedom of Speech – Restrictions on speech related to religion can conflict with secular values of open discourse.
Criminal Punishments – Harsh penalties like amputation for theft or stoning for adultery contradict modern human rights norms.
LGBTQ+ Rights – Homosexuality is often criminalized, with severe punishments in some interpretations.
Secular Governance – The integration of religion into law can challenge democratic principles and the separation of church and state.
Cultural Restrictions – Music, art, and entertainment may be censored based on religious doctrine.
Interfaith Relations – Legal disadvantages for non-Muslims in family law, business, or public life can create social divisions.
I hope that helps. There are more but I thought ten would be good enough.
-
In Texas, there are maga Christian laws: 10 Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom. Books removed from library shelves. Women don't have bodily autonomy in Texas. The libraries in some urban high schools have been converted to detention centers.
Honestly, I don't know why anybody wants to build anything in Texas. There is a "Musk" town where everyone living there works for him. There are giant paintings of his face on the buildings and giant statues in the town square. The governor and attorney general are criminals, their Senator helps nobody except himself, and the electric grid is a disaster.
The United States is plucking people off the streets and sending them to a foreign prison, even if they are legal residents that committed no crimes. Oops!
There is a portion of Northern Idaho that is a Christian enclave and only certain "brands" of Christians are invited to live there. Roman Catholics need not apply.
I am not a fan of Sharia Law, but in this country, we are implementing a Christian version that is just as bad. And THAT folks is why we need separation of church and state.
-
In Texas, there are maga Christian laws: 10 Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom. Books removed from library shelves. Women don't have bodily autonomy in Texas. The libraries in some urban high schools have been converted to detention centers.
Honestly, I don't know why anybody wants to build anything in Texas. There is a "Musk" town where everyone living there works for him. There are giant paintings of his face on the buildings and giant statues in the town square. The governor and attorney general are criminals, their Senator helps nobody except himself, and the electric grid is a disaster.
There is a portion of Northern Idaho that is a Christian enclave and only certain "brands" of Christians are invited to live there. Roman Catholics need not apply.
I am not a fan of Sharia Law, but in this country, we are implementing a Christian version that is just as bad.
-
Musk is an atheist. Anything the guy does is nothing to do with Christianity. Personally I liked the guy when the liberal left loved the guy. Back then he was a shining star climbing change loved by all progressives and liberals. His mistake was complaining about his transgender kid getting brainwashed and complimenting our now President.
I see your point with the 10 commandments being on display. That's a fair statement. Prior 1980 they were on display in schools since the beginning. This is because most schools were in churches as the country grew. There were no spaces available so Christians helped with that until the populace could be dumbed down enough for direct school taxation. Personally I'd not want Bible stuff in school same as lgbtqia++map stuff. That said, I'll still say you're right on that one. Times have changed and the country doesn't need the churches charity anymore. We'd prefer to get taxed.
Mormons operate outside of biblical principles and have added to the Bible. If Jesus is real He'll have harsh dealings with them but he's forgiving so hopefully it all ends well.
Abortion, tough one. I like to think of that little human who has his own heartbeat. Poor little guy just wants to live. Who's looking out for him? Doesn't anyone care about little babies anymore? Back in 1969 the doctors told maw they should cut me out and toss me to the landfill. She was too old they said. Maw was maw though. A fine one across the board. I had my very own Mother Mary. Beautiful and wise in so many ways.
Christians don't have a doctrine that commands punishment friend.
-
They are also instituting a law that makes it illegal to be transgender. They'll be calling it "gender fraud." They have gone all out on the religious hate.
-
-
-
No preference should be made for any religion. All organized religious property and income should be taxed just like the big businesses they are. Freedom of Religion is a personal right but just as important is freedom FROM religion. Radical Evangicals Christians are as dangerous as Muslims who follow Shari Law.
-
Makes me wonder how insecure and afraid these so-called christians are. It sounds like their afraid that their christian god isn’t very strong.
-
Makes me wonder how insecure and afraid these so-called non-christians are. It sounds like their afraid that their non-christian woke fake god isn’t very strong.
-
I'm pretty sure you wouldn't call someone who claims to be non-christian a christian so this doesn't really work as a turnaround. Also it's "they're afraid" not "their afraid."
-
Velma,
Self preservation is not a mechanism of insecurity. It's a mechanism of survival we living things are equipped with.
When an individual expresses his desire to help you by killing you, it should only take a few milliseconds to recall the historical truth behind that sentiment. You can trust its truth.
Have you ever had your life threatened by words or direct physical action against you?
I have a few times, I always take it seriously. Fear never enters the equation, just logic.
-
-
Naw, folks in Texas just don't want all the paperwork that comes with honor killings, beheadings, lgbtqia++map executions, suicide bombings, and in general the brutalization of all women and girls.
Lots and lots of paperwork nobody really wants to fill out.
-
Servantofjustice.
If I were to be really frank about all religion it's all made up by man. Abrahamic religion is the most restrictive and brutal towards females. Since the Gods of those religions are portrayed as male. Since the Muslims and Christians are patriarchal religions, the inequities racism prejudice are built in. I have only study 500 religions for my thesis to obtain my PHD in history years ago. I am a retired history professor. So I stand by my research.
-
Wilberta,
I've not found any racism in the old testament or new testament. Nor have I found any brutality towards women by design.
If one searches the Internet for proof of unicorns, they'll find it. If they search for proof against unicorns they'll find it. I might suggest you're looking for proof of brutality against women while I just read the book as written without preconceived notions beyond its divine inspiration.
Furthermore, ultimately our own lives are either patriarchal or matriarchal. Indeed, a man and a woman will live under one of the two systems when living together or separate from one another.
Islam on the other hand doesn't need a professor of history to explain it's behavior towards women. The 6 o'clock news will do just fine.
-
Servant of Judgement
There are multiple examples of racism in the Bible. Women are oppressed in Islam.
These are indisputable facts.
History does illustrate the oppression of women in Islam over and over and over...
-
Dr jack
There might be a record of humans behaving in a unbecoming way according to God in the Bible but you'll not find the bible setting a precedent of racism or poor treatment of women. People like to read the Bibles account of mans deplorable behavior and attribute it to God's commandment. In reality, God is kind enough to tell us how we behave so those of us with open eyes can see it, prepare for it and also avoid it
Just as a WW2 documentary might describe the Nazi behavior doesn't mean the documentary condones the Nazi behavior, rather points it out.
Regarding your observation of Islam, we agree. As I said, you won't need a degree in history in order to learn this with Islam, just open up the Sunday paper.
-
SOJ...Have you really never read the Bible?
1 Corinthians 14:34-35 The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
1 Timothy 2:11-15 Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.
Ephesians 5:22-33 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,...
Genesis 3:16 To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you.”
Titus 2:4-5 And so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled.
Additionally, people of different views will quote (and misquote) various passages in the Bible to justify their own hate and bigotry...and they will all swear they are following it "as it is written". Sharia Law is very much the same. All who follow the Muslim Faith don't ascribe to that type of hate and horror, any more than all Christians follow the filth spewed from the likes of Joel Osteen and his ilk.
-
Martin, I studied the old testament for about 6 years before moving on to the new testament. I've not read Timothy or Ephesians yet but I went ahead and read the verses you quoted plus the preceding and post verses.
This will anger the type of woman Corinthians and Timothy both refer to. The natural state of women is she will by nature want to claim authority over their man, an office, a house and a church. Sometimes we're lucky to see an unlucky man who's got a woman like this. He'll look like a husk void of self direction and ambition. If you get the chance to observe an office full of women at a business or church, you'll see an office filled with tension, grudges, eggshells and back biting. Sorry but that's what it is. I've not met a woman that disagrees with me. God doesn't want that in church.
You'll notice there's no punishment issued for violating that guideline.Ephesians is telling men and women as we submit to God as our leader and caregiver women submit to men as the leader and caregiver and men are to unconditionally love their wives and be as loyal and faithful to them as Christ is to us. Men are to literally give their life to their women. Her needs come first. We sacrifice ourselves for her.
Titus looks good as is. Haven't read it yet, didn't need to but I will one day. I'm fond of a woman that's married to me when she loves me. I got one like that at home and my, my is it nice to be loved, she loves the kids mightily also. Titus looks good, can't wait to get there.
Genesis states the condition of women today. Surely you don't think child bearing is a breeze. That's God dealing with women, not man dealing with woman. Again, no punishment issued or demanded of by men.
Im just reading it as is like you said. I read it and think about it. The bible does say if you don't believe God inspired it you won't understand it.
Seems simple to me:
Men treat your women like queens you love unconditionally. Give all you are and all you have to your wife.
Women treat your men like men and reciprocate the love the man initiates. Play nice with others.
Easy.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
These hypocrites that demanded "Freedom of Religion" and then demand it only for themselves and their religion are disgusting. Abbot's making assumptions and claims without any proof. And the nonsense about this being a Christian nation? No. This is what happens when you cut public education and quit teaching real history. These cowards need to crawl back under the rocks they came from.
-
Sharia law is not and should never be introduced into any country around the world.They follow their own laws what happened to Thou shall not kill it happened recently here in The U.K a little girl was tortured by her family and killed
-
They can make their own cities all they want, what they CANNOT do is make their own laws and follow them instead of the laws from the state. Now there is such a thing as "home rule" which means they can make their own city laws as long as their laws do not conflict with general laws of the state or try and overturn same (they can make them more strict up to a point but thats it) but they would still be required to follow the laws of the county/state/and US Government. If they refuse to do this then sorry but no city.
-
They have no such intention, that's Greg Abbott's idea, not theirs. He is the one coming up with this.
-
God is the creator of all of us. We don't need to fear others because we are too fearful to learn that others are trying in their own way to be connected to the Devine. In traveling to over 72 countries and photographing the work of NGO's around the world I see we have much more in common that what divides us. At the heart of the major religous traditions there is a desire to be charatable, kind and to look out for others. I would challenge the Governor to join in on breaking the Fast with Muslems during Ramadan, celebrate Thanks Giving with additional people around the table. Let understanding and knowledge do away with fear where none should exist. Lets also look at what others are fearing about America and the implied distrespect we are showing. We need to remove the mote in our own eye. Coming together in compassion would do alot in that department.